lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231026150154.3536433-1-syoshida@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 00:01:54 +0900
From: Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@...hat.com>
To: stefanha@...hat.com,
	sgarzare@...hat.com,
	davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] virtio/vsock: Fix uninit-value in virtio_transport_recv_pkt()

KMSAN reported the following uninit-value access issue:

=====================================================
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0x1dfb/0x26a0 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1421
 virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0x1dfb/0x26a0 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1421
 vsock_loopback_work+0x3bb/0x5a0 net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c:120
 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:2630 [inline]
 process_scheduled_works+0xff6/0x1e60 kernel/workqueue.c:2703
 worker_thread+0xeca/0x14d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2784
 kthread+0x3cc/0x520 kernel/kthread.c:388
 ret_from_fork+0x66/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304

Uninit was stored to memory at:
 virtio_transport_space_update net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1274 [inline]
 virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0x1ee8/0x26a0 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1415
 vsock_loopback_work+0x3bb/0x5a0 net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c:120
 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:2630 [inline]
 process_scheduled_works+0xff6/0x1e60 kernel/workqueue.c:2703
 worker_thread+0xeca/0x14d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2784
 kthread+0x3cc/0x520 kernel/kthread.c:388
 ret_from_fork+0x66/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304

Uninit was created at:
 slab_post_alloc_hook+0x105/0xad0 mm/slab.h:767
 slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3478 [inline]
 kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x5a2/0xaf0 mm/slub.c:3523
 kmalloc_reserve+0x13c/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:559
 __alloc_skb+0x2fd/0x770 net/core/skbuff.c:650
 alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1286 [inline]
 virtio_vsock_alloc_skb include/linux/virtio_vsock.h:66 [inline]
 virtio_transport_alloc_skb+0x90/0x11e0 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:58
 virtio_transport_reset_no_sock net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:957 [inline]
 virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0x1279/0x26a0 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1387
 vsock_loopback_work+0x3bb/0x5a0 net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c:120
 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:2630 [inline]
 process_scheduled_works+0xff6/0x1e60 kernel/workqueue.c:2703
 worker_thread+0xeca/0x14d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2784
 kthread+0x3cc/0x520 kernel/kthread.c:388
 ret_from_fork+0x66/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304

CPU: 1 PID: 10664 Comm: kworker/1:5 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc3-00146-g9f3ebbef746f #3
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-1.fc38 04/01/2014
Workqueue: vsock-loopback vsock_loopback_work
=====================================================

The following simple reproducer can cause the issue described above:

int main(void)
{
  int sock;
  struct sockaddr_vm addr = {
    .svm_family = AF_VSOCK,
    .svm_cid = VMADDR_CID_ANY,
    .svm_port = 1234,
  };

  sock = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
  connect(sock, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, sizeof(addr));
  return 0;
}

This issue occurs because the `buf_alloc` and `fwd_cnt` fields of the
`struct virtio_vsock_hdr` are not initialized when a new skb is allocated
in `virtio_transport_alloc_skb()`. This patch resolves the issue by
initializing these fields during allocation.

Fixes: 71dc9ec9ac7d ("virtio/vsock: replace virtio_vsock_pkt with sk_buff")
Signed-off-by: Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@...hat.com>
---
 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
index 352d042b130b..102673bef189 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
@@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ virtio_transport_alloc_skb(struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info,
 	hdr->dst_port	= cpu_to_le32(dst_port);
 	hdr->flags	= cpu_to_le32(info->flags);
 	hdr->len	= cpu_to_le32(len);
+	hdr->buf_alloc	= cpu_to_le32(0);
+	hdr->fwd_cnt	= cpu_to_le32(0);
 
 	if (info->msg && len > 0) {
 		payload = skb_put(skb, len);
-- 
2.41.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ