[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <005b6980-4aa3-4bf7-92cc-d9f938b04006@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 22:01:28 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
corbet@....net, Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
horms@...nel.org, casper.casan@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Horatiu.Vultur@...rochip.com,
Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com, Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Thorsten.Kummermehr@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/9] net: ethernet: oa_tc6: implement mac-phy
software reset
> >> + ret = oa_tc6_perform_ctrl(tc6, STATUS0, ®val, 1, false, false);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + return ret;
> >> +
> >> + /* Check for reset complete interrupt status */
> >> + if (regval & RESETC) {
> >> + regval = RESETC;
> >
> > People don't always agree, but i found STATUS0_RESETC easier to see
> > you have the correct bit for the register you just read.
> Do you want me to define STATUS0_RESETC instead of RESETC or is my
> understanding wrong?
Correct, STATUS0_RESETC. It avoids silly typos like:
ret = oa_tc6_perform_ctrl(tc6, STATUS0, ®val, 1, false, false);
if (ret)
return ret;
/* Check for reset complete interrupt status */
if (regval & RESET) {
regval = RESETC;
where RESET is a valid register name, but not a bit. Or say:
ret = oa_tc6_perform_ctrl(tc6, STATUS0, ®val, 1, false, false);
if (ret)
return ret;
/* Check for reset complete interrupt status */
if (regval & SWRESET) {
regval = STATUS0_;
where SWRESET is a valid bit, but not for STATUS0.
I've made silly mistakes like this, and learnt that good naming helps
to avoid it.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists