lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAJq09z5wm=WMifELQ2cEYWb1L4Wsc4nkaj0o8p+fireY5QG-uQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 19:03:19 -0300 From: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com> To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org, alsi@...g-olufsen.dk, andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, olteanv@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, krzk+dt@...nel.org, arinc.unal@...nc9.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] dt-bindings: net: dsa: realtek: add reset controller > > + resets: > > + maxItems: 1 > > + > > + reset-names: > > + const: switch > > $block-name is not really a useful name for resources. Generally, you > don't need -names if there's only 1 entry. I didn't know the reset-control name was optional. Yes, it is not useful. I'll get rid of it. It looks like there are more bindings where it is not necessary. Regards, Luiz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists