netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] dt-bindings: net: dsa: realtek: add reset controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJq09z5wm=WMifELQ2cEYWb1L4Wsc4nkaj0o8p+fireY5QG-uQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 19:03:19 -0300
From: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org, alsi@...g-olufsen.dk, 
	andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, 
	olteanv@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, 
	krzk+dt@...nel.org, arinc.unal@...nc9.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] dt-bindings: net: dsa: realtek: add reset controller

> > +  resets:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +  reset-names:
> > +    const: switch
>
> $block-name is not really a useful name for resources. Generally, you
> don't need -names if there's only 1 entry.

I didn't know the reset-control name was optional. Yes, it is not
useful. I'll get rid of it.
It looks like there are more bindings where it is not necessary.

Regards,

Luiz