netdev - [PATCH net-next 07/10] mptcp: move sk assignment statement ahead

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231025-send-net-next-20231025-v1-7-db8f25f798eb@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 16:37:08 -0700
From: Mat Martineau <martineau@...nel.org>
To: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>, 
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
 Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@...e.com>, 
 Kishen Maloor <kishen.maloor@...el.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, mptcp@...ts.linux.dev, 
 Mat Martineau <martineau@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 07/10] mptcp: move sk assignment statement ahead

From: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@...e.com>

If we move the sk assignment statement ahead in mptcp_nl_cmd_sf_create()
or mptcp_nl_cmd_sf_destroy(), right after the msk null-check statements,
sk can be used after the create_err or destroy_err labels instead of
open-coding it again.

Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@...nel.org>
---
 net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c b/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c
index 25fa37ac3620..7bb2b29e5b96 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c
@@ -335,6 +335,8 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_create_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 		return err;
 	}
 
+	sk = (struct sock *)msk;
+
 	if (!mptcp_pm_is_userspace(msk)) {
 		GENL_SET_ERR_MSG(info, "invalid request; userspace PM not selected");
 		goto create_err;
@@ -352,8 +354,6 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_create_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 		goto create_err;
 	}
 
-	sk = (struct sock *)msk;
-
 	if (!mptcp_pm_addr_families_match(sk, &addr_l, &addr_r)) {
 		GENL_SET_ERR_MSG(info, "families mismatch");
 		err = -EINVAL;
@@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_create_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 	spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
 
  create_err:
-	sock_put((struct sock *)msk);
+	sock_put(sk);
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -458,6 +458,8 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_destroy_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info
 		return err;
 	}
 
+	sk = (struct sock *)msk;
+
 	if (!mptcp_pm_is_userspace(msk)) {
 		GENL_SET_ERR_MSG(info, "invalid request; userspace PM not selected");
 		goto destroy_err;
@@ -487,7 +489,6 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_destroy_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info
 		goto destroy_err;
 	}
 
-	sk = (struct sock *)msk;
 	lock_sock(sk);
 	ssk = mptcp_nl_find_ssk(msk, &addr_l, &addr_r);
 	if (ssk) {
@@ -507,7 +508,7 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_destroy_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info
 	release_sock(sk);
 
 destroy_err:
-	sock_put((struct sock *)msk);
+	sock_put(sk);
 	return err;
 }
 

-- 
2.41.0