netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v7 0/5] Rust abstractions for network PHY drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72nwy6n1_LXGxq7SU6wFmoci_aE2qn5qyzuW7jo8mqTvQg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 12:22:07 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, tmgross@...ch.edu, 
	benno.lossin@...ton.me, wedsonaf@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 0/5] Rust abstractions for network PHY drivers

On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 4:47 AM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> It should also be noted, patches don't need reviews to be merged. If
> there is no feedback within three days, and it passes the CI tests, it
> likely will be merged. Real problems can be fixed up later, if need
> be.

Passing CI tests does not tell you whether abstractions are
well-designed or sound, which is the key property Rust abstractions
need.

And I hope by "don't need reviews to be merged" you mean "at least
somebody, perhaps the applier, has taken a look".

Cheers,
Miguel