[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a9b610e6-b0ce-46b6-89ea-faef78c5a4f2@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:16:41 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Petr Machata <me@...chata.org>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
stephen@...workplumber.org, daniel.machon@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [patch iproute2-next v3 3/6] devlink: extend
pr_out_nested_handle() to print object
On 10/27/23 7:12 AM, Petr Machata wrote:
> I was wondering whether somehing like this might make sense in the
> iproute2 library:
>
> #define alloca_sprintf(FMT, ...) ({ \
> int xasprintf_n = snprintf(NULL, 0, (FMT), __VA_ARGS__); \
> char *xasprintf_buf = alloca(xasprintf_n); \
> sprintf(xasprintf_buf, (FMT), __VA_ARGS__); \
> xasprintf_buf; \
> })
>
> void foo() {
> const char *buf = alloca_sprintf("%x %y %z", etc.);
> printf(... buf ...);
> }
>
> I'm not really happy with it -- because of alloca vs. array, and because
> of the double evaluation. But all those SPRINT_BUF's peppered everywhere
> make me uneasy every time I read or write them.
agreed.
>
> Or maybe roll something custom asprintf-like that can reuse and/or
> realloc a passed-in buffer?
>
> The sprintf story is pretty bad in iproute2 right now, IMHO.
It is a bit of a mess. If you have a few cycles, want to send an RFC?
Just pick 1 or 2 to convert to show intent with a new design.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists