netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v7 0/5] Rust abstractions for network PHY drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 04:47:17 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, tmgross@...ch.edu,
	benno.lossin@...ton.me, wedsonaf@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 0/5] Rust abstractions for network PHY drivers

> I wonder whether that actually helps, if a reviewer takes average four
> days to review a version (wants to give accurate comments and doesn't
> work on this full time), and the developer send a new version every
> three days, there is no possible way for the developer to get the
> reviews.
> 
> (Honestly, if people could reach out to a conclusion for anything in
> three days, the world would be a much more peaceful place ;-))

May i suggest you subscribe to the netdev list and watch it in action.

It should also be noted, patches don't need reviews to be merged. If
there is no feedback within three days, and it passes the CI tests, it
likely will be merged. Real problems can be fixed up later, if need
be.

	Andrew