[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZTt05z87/89QXmcC@nanopsycho>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 10:29:27 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, stephen@...workplumber.org,
daniel.machon@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [patch iproute2-next v3 4/6] devlink: introduce support for
netns id for nested handle
Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 07:08:04PM CEST, dsahern@...il.com wrote:
>On 10/24/23 4:04 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
>>
>> Nested handle may contain DEVLINK_ATTR_NETNS_ID attribute that indicates
>> the network namespace where the nested devlink instance resides. Process
>> this converting to netns name if possible and print to user.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
>> ---
>> v2->v3:
>> - moved netns_name_by_id() into lib/namespace.c
>> - s/netns_name_by_id/netns_name_from_id/
>> - rebased on top of new patch "devlink: extend pr_out_nested_handle() to
>> print object"
>> v1->v2:
>> - use previously introduced netns_netnsid_from_name() instead of code
>> duplication for the same function.
>> - s/nesns_name_by_id_func/netns_name_by_id_func/
>> ---
>> devlink/devlink.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> include/namespace.h | 1 +
>> lib/namespace.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/devlink/devlink.c b/devlink/devlink.c
>> index f7325477f271..7ba2d0dcac72 100644
>> --- a/devlink/devlink.c
>> +++ b/devlink/devlink.c
>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>> #include <linux/genetlink.h>
>> #include <linux/devlink.h>
>> #include <linux/netlink.h>
>> +#include <linux/net_namespace.h>
>> #include <libmnl/libmnl.h>
>> #include <netinet/ether.h>
>> #include <sys/select.h>
>> @@ -722,6 +723,7 @@ static const enum mnl_attr_data_type devlink_policy[DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX + 1] = {
>> [DEVLINK_ATTR_LINECARD_SUPPORTED_TYPES] = MNL_TYPE_NESTED,
>> [DEVLINK_ATTR_NESTED_DEVLINK] = MNL_TYPE_NESTED,
>> [DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTESTS] = MNL_TYPE_NESTED,
>> + [DEVLINK_ATTR_NETNS_ID] = MNL_TYPE_U32,
>> };
>>
>> static const enum mnl_attr_data_type
>> @@ -2865,7 +2867,26 @@ static void __pr_out_nested_handle(struct dl *dl, struct nlattr *nla_nested_dl,
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> - __pr_out_handle_start(dl, tb, false, false);
>> + __pr_out_handle_start(dl, tb, tb[DEVLINK_ATTR_NETNS_ID], false);
>> + if (tb[DEVLINK_ATTR_NETNS_ID]) {
>> + int32_t id = mnl_attr_get_u32(tb[DEVLINK_ATTR_NETNS_ID]);
>> +
>> + if (id >= 0) {
>
>why does the kernel side even add DEVLINK_ATTR_NETNS_ID if
>peernet2id_alloc fails?
Yep. So the user knows that this is in a different namespace. This
logic is copied from iplink
>
>
>> + char *name = netns_name_from_id(id);
>> +
>> + if (name) {
>> + print_string(PRINT_ANY, "netns",
>> + " netns %s", name);
>> + free(name);
>> + } else {
>> + print_int(PRINT_ANY, "netnsid",
>> + " netnsid %d", id);
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + print_string(PRINT_FP, NULL, " netnsid %s", "unknown");
>> + print_int(PRINT_JSON, "netnsid", NULL, id);
>
>ie., how is -1 useful to userspace?
The userspace knows that this device is in a different netnamespace, but
it is unknown as peernet2id_alloc failed. Should be really a rare
corner case when system is under memory pressure.
>
>
>> + }
>> + }
>> pr_out_handle_end(dl);
>> }
>>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists