netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: bpf: Use sockopt_lock_sock() in ip_sock_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: 
 <169844762477.22694.16622849880566679221.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 23:00:24 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org,
 andrii@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, kernel-team@...com,
 edumazet@...gle.com, martin.lau@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: bpf: Use sockopt_lock_sock() in
 ip_sock_set_tos()

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:

On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:24:24 -0700 you wrote:
> With latest sync from net-next tree, bpf-next has a bpf selftest failure:
>   [root@...h-fb-vm1 bpf]# ./test_progs -t setget_sockopt
>   ...
>   [   76.194349] ============================================
>   [   76.194682] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
>   [   76.195039] 6.6.0-rc7-g37884503df08-dirty #67 Tainted: G        W  OE
>   [   76.195518] --------------------------------------------
>   [   76.195852] new_name/154 is trying to acquire lock:
>   [   76.196159] ffff8c3e06ad8d30 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: ip_sock_set_tos+0x19/0x30
>   [   76.196669]
>   [   76.196669] but task is already holding lock:
>   [   76.197028] ffff8c3e06ad8d30 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: inet_listen+0x21/0x70
>   [   76.197517]
>   [   76.197517] other info that might help us debug this:
>   [   76.197919]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>   [   76.197919]
>   [   76.198287]        CPU0
>   [   76.198444]        ----
>   [   76.198600]   lock(sk_lock-AF_INET);
>   [   76.198831]   lock(sk_lock-AF_INET);
>   [   76.199062]
>   [   76.199062]  *** DEADLOCK ***
>   [   76.199062]
>   [   76.199420]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
>   [   76.199420]
>   [   76.199879] 2 locks held by new_name/154:
>   [   76.200131]  #0: ffff8c3e06ad8d30 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: inet_listen+0x21/0x70
>   [   76.200644]  #1: ffffffff90f96a40 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sock_ops+0x55/0x290
>   [   76.201268]
>   [   76.201268] stack backtrace:
>   [   76.201538] CPU: 4 PID: 154 Comm: new_name Tainted: G        W  OE      6.6.0-rc7-g37884503df08-dirty #67
>   [   76.202134] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
>   [   76.202699] Call Trace:
>   [   76.202858]  <TASK>
>   [   76.203002]  dump_stack_lvl+0x4b/0x80
>   [   76.203239]  __lock_acquire+0x740/0x1ec0
>   [   76.203503]  lock_acquire+0xc1/0x2a0
>   [   76.203766]  ? ip_sock_set_tos+0x19/0x30
>   [   76.204050]  ? sk_stream_write_space+0x12a/0x230
>   [   76.204389]  ? lock_release+0xbe/0x260
>   [   76.204661]  lock_sock_nested+0x32/0x80
>   [   76.204942]  ? ip_sock_set_tos+0x19/0x30
>   [   76.205208]  ip_sock_set_tos+0x19/0x30
>   [   76.205452]  do_ip_setsockopt+0x4b3/0x1580
>   [   76.205719]  __bpf_setsockopt+0x62/0xa0
>   [   76.205963]  bpf_sock_ops_setsockopt+0x11/0x20
>   [   76.206247]  bpf_prog_630217292049c96e_bpf_test_sockopt_int+0xbc/0x123
>   [   76.206660]  bpf_prog_493685a3bae00bbd_bpf_test_ip_sockopt+0x49/0x4b
>   [   76.207055]  bpf_prog_b0bcd27f269aeea0_skops_sockopt+0x44c/0xec7
>   [   76.207437]  __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sock_ops+0xda/0x290
>   [   76.207829]  __inet_listen_sk+0x108/0x1b0
>   [   76.208122]  inet_listen+0x48/0x70
>   [   76.208373]  __sys_listen+0x74/0xb0
>   [   76.208630]  __x64_sys_listen+0x16/0x20
>   [   76.208911]  do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x90
>   [   76.209174]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
>   ...
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next] net: bpf: Use sockopt_lock_sock() in ip_sock_set_tos()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/06497763c8f1

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html