netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v7 1/5] rust: core abstractions for network PHY drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZT2YmC70zrCgxlHo@Boquns-Mac-mini.home>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 16:26:16 -0700
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, tmgross@...ch.edu,
	miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com, wedsonaf@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 1/5] rust: core abstractions for network PHY
 drivers

On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 09:23:25PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Now let's look back into struct phy_device, it does have a few locks
> > in it, and at least even with phydev->lock held, the content of
> > phydev->lock itself can be changed (e.g tick locks), hence it breaks the
> > requirement of the existence of a `&bindings::phy_device`.
> 
> tick locks appear to be a Rust thing, so are unlikely to appear in a C

Ah, I meant ticket locks... same here a mutex has a wait_lock which can
be implemented by ticket locks or queued spin locks, so the u32 lock
field may change even with lock held.

Regards,
Boqun

> structure. However, kernel C mutex does have a linked list of other
> threads waiting for the mutex. So phydev->lock can change at any time,
> even when held.
> 
> 	Andrew