netdev - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4 1/6] net: ethtool: allow symmetric-xor RSS hash for any flow type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2023 14:25:17 +0200
From: Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>
To: Ahmed Zaki <ahmed.zaki@...el.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: mkubecek@...e.cz, andrew@...n.ch, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com,
 Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@...el.com>, corbet@....net,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, edumazet@...gle.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
 horms@...nel.org, vladimir.oltean@....com,
 Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
 pabeni@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v4 1/6] net: ethtool: allow
 symmetric-xor RSS hash for any flow type

On 21/10/2023 3:00, Ahmed Zaki wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2023-10-20 17:49, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 17:14:11 -0600 Ahmed Zaki wrote:
>>> I replied to that here:
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/afb4a06f-cfba-47ba-adb3-09bea7cb5f00@intel.com/
>>>
>>> I am kind of confused now so please bear with me. ethtool either sends
>>> "ethtool_rxfh" or "ethtool_rxnfc". AFAIK "ethtool_rxfh" is the interface
>>> for "ethtool -X" which is used to set the RSS algorithm. But we kind of
>>> agreed to go with "ethtool -U|-N" for symmetric-xor, and that uses
>>> "ethtool_rxnfc" (as implemented in this series).
>>
>> I have no strong preference. Sounds like Alex prefers to keep it closer
>> to algo, which is "ethtool_rxfh".
>>
>>> Do you mean use "ethtool_rxfh" instead of "ethtool_rxnfc"? how would
>>> that work on the ethtool user interface?
>>
>> I don't know what you're asking of us. If you find the code to confusing
>> maybe someone at Intel can help you :|
> 
> The code is straightforward. I am confused by the requirements: don't
> add a new algorithm but use "ethtool_rxfh".
> 
> I'll see if I can get more help, may be I am missing something.
> 

What was the decision here?
Is this going to be exposed through ethtool -N or -X?