lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <6c10edf1-dad1-4a4f-ae0e-42b17febbd5d@lunn.ch> Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2023 18:35:49 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dsa: tag_rtl4_a: Bump min packet size > The switch is pretty bogus, all documentation we have of it is a vendor > code drop, no data sheet. The format for ingress and egress tags > was discovered using trial-and-error. The code drop does not include tagging? Does the code drop also pad to full size Ethernet frames? I still think it would be good to do some systematic testing to figure out if there is any pattern to the drops. Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists