[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6c10edf1-dad1-4a4f-ae0e-42b17febbd5d@lunn.ch>
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2023 18:35:49 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dsa: tag_rtl4_a: Bump min packet size
> The switch is pretty bogus, all documentation we have of it is a vendor
> code drop, no data sheet. The format for ingress and egress tags
> was discovered using trial-and-error.
The code drop does not include tagging? Does the code drop also pad to
full size Ethernet frames?
I still think it would be good to do some systematic testing to figure
out if there is any pattern to the drops.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists