[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e70fda8c-a924-44ab-be76-292f315b852a@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 21:25:34 +0200
From: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
Samin Guo <samin.guo@...rfivetech.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt
<palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] dt-bindings: net: starfive,jh7110-dwmac: Drop
superfluous select
On 10/30/23 09:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 29/10/2023 22:08, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>> On 10/29/23 13:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 29/10/2023 05:27, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>>>> The usage of 'select' doesn't seem to have any influence on how this
>>>> binding schema is applied to the nodes, hence remove it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It has. Why do you think it doesn't? You should see new errors from
>>> dwmac schema.
>>
>> This patch came as a result of testing both variants (w/ and w/o
>> 'select') with several different compatible strings and seeing
>> consistent output:
>>
>> - "starfive,jh7110-dwmac", "invalid";
>> - "starfive,jh7110-dwmac";
>> - "invalid", "snps,dwmac-5.20";
>> - "invalid"
>>
>> Did I miss something?
>
> Testing all bindings? The select is there to prevent matching unrelated
> bindings.
Indeed, my bad, as I've been using DT_SCHEMA_FILES to restrict the scope
during initial testing and missed to include later other schemas for an
extended validation (note that since [1] it's possible to specify a list
of file paths separated by ':').
Will drop this in v3.
[1] 25eba1598c8e ("dt-bindings: Fix multi pattern support in
DT_SCHEMA_FILES")
Thanks,
Cristian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists