netdev - Re: [Patch v2] hv_netvsc: Mark VF as slave before exposing it to user-mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 14:25:42 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: longli@...uxonhyperv.com
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>, Haiyang Zhang
 <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui
 <decui@...rosoft.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2] hv_netvsc: Mark VF as slave before exposing it to
 user-mode

On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 13:59:50 -0700 longli@...uxonhyperv.com wrote:
> When a VF is being exposed form the kernel, it should be marked as "slave"
> before exposing to the user-mode. The VF is not usable without netvsc running
> as master. The user-mode should never see a VF without the "slave" flag.
> 
> This commit moves the code of setting the slave flag to the time before VF is
> exposed to user-mode.

Can you give a real example in the commit message of a flow in user
space which would get confused by seeing the VF netdev without
IFF_SLAVE?

You're only moving setting IFF_SLAVE but not linking the master,
is there no code which would assume that if SLAVE is set there 
is a master?