netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] dt-bindings: net: starfive,jh7110-dwmac: Drop superfluous select

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6b91a6df-4549-4ca8-9659-c6107f4f8c75@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 08:27:24 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
 Samin Guo <samin.guo@...rfivetech.com>,
 Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt
 <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
 Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
 Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
 Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
 Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
 Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] dt-bindings: net: starfive,jh7110-dwmac: Drop
 superfluous select

On 29/10/2023 22:08, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> On 10/29/23 13:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 29/10/2023 05:27, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>>> The usage of 'select' doesn't seem to have any influence on how this
>>> binding schema is applied to the nodes, hence remove it.
>>>
>>
>> It has. Why do you think it doesn't? You should see new errors from
>> dwmac schema.
> 
> This patch came as a result of testing both variants (w/ and w/o
> 'select') with several different compatible strings and seeing
> consistent output:
> 
> - "starfive,jh7110-dwmac", "invalid";
> - "starfive,jh7110-dwmac";
> - "invalid", "snps,dwmac-5.20";
> - "invalid"
> 
> Did I miss something?

Testing all bindings? The select is there to prevent matching unrelated
bindings.

Best regards,
Krzysztof