netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2] net: dsa: tag_rtl4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 01:37:37 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: dsa: tag_rtl4_a: Bump min packet size

On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 01:09:06AM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 11:57:33PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > This of course make no sense, since the padding function should do nothing
> > when the packet is bigger than 60 bytes.
> 
> Indeed, this of course makes no sense. Ping doesn't work, or ARP doesn't
> work? Could you add a static ARP entry for the 192.168.1.137 IP address?

Probably the ARP, since they are short packets and probably need the
padding.

	Andrew