netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2] net: dsa: tag_rtl4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 15:16:50 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: dsa: tag_rtl4_a: Bump min packet size

On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 12:33 AM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 11:57:33PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > Here you can incidentally also see what happens if we don't pad the big packets:
> > the packet gets truncated.
>
> Are we sure we are debugging a switch problem? On how many platforms
> with the RTL8366RB can the issue be seen? Is the conduit interface the
> same on all these platforms, or is it different and that makes no
> difference?

I don't have any other RTL8366RB systems than the D-Link DIR-685.

I however have several systems with the same backing ethernet controller
connected directly to a PHY and they all work fine.

Yours,
Linus Walleij