lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20231102123230.luoyrh2j4r4bbwjf@skbuf> Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 14:32:30 +0200 From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: dsa: tag_rtl4_a: Bump min packet size On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 08:02:29PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 5:34 PM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> wrote: > > So on the gemini-dlink-dir-685.dts platform, you can also use &gmac1 as > > a plain Ethernet port, right? > > As a port it exist on the SoC yes but it is not connected physically > to anything. > > &gmac0 is connected to the switch, and the switch has all the PHYs. (...) > If you by remote end mean the end of a physical cable there is > no way I can do that, as I have no PHY on gmac1. > > (I don't know if I misunderstand the question...) No, you aren't. > But I have other Gemini platforms, so I will try to do it on one > of them! Let's see if I can do this thing.... Ok.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists