netdev - Re: [PATCH] net/smc: avoid atomic_set and smp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231102145418.GH92403@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 22:54:18 +0800
From: Dust Li <dust.li@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/smc: avoid atomic_set and smp_wmb in the tx path
 when possible

On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 05:27:12PM +0800, Li RongQing wrote:
>these is less opportunity that conn->tx_pushing is not 1, since

these -> there ?

>tx_pushing is just checked with 1, so move the setting tx_pushing
>to 1 after atomic_dec_and_test() return false, to avoid atomic_set
>and smp_wmb in tx path when possible

The patch should add [PATCH net-next] subject-prefix since this is an optimization.

Besides, do you have any performance number ?

Thanks

>
>Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>
>---
> net/smc/smc_tx.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/smc/smc_tx.c b/net/smc/smc_tx.c
>index 3b0ff3b..72dbdee 100644
>--- a/net/smc/smc_tx.c
>+++ b/net/smc/smc_tx.c
>@@ -667,8 +667,6 @@ int smc_tx_sndbuf_nonempty(struct smc_connection *conn)
> 		return 0;
> 
> again:
>-	atomic_set(&conn->tx_pushing, 1);
>-	smp_wmb(); /* Make sure tx_pushing is 1 before real send */
> 	rc = __smc_tx_sndbuf_nonempty(conn);
> 
> 	/* We need to check whether someone else have added some data into
>@@ -677,8 +675,11 @@ int smc_tx_sndbuf_nonempty(struct smc_connection *conn)
> 	 * If so, we need to push again to prevent those data hang in the send
> 	 * queue.
> 	 */
>-	if (unlikely(!atomic_dec_and_test(&conn->tx_pushing)))
>+	if (unlikely(!atomic_dec_and_test(&conn->tx_pushing))) {
>+		atomic_set(&conn->tx_pushing, 1);
>+		smp_wmb(); /* Make sure tx_pushing is 1 before real send */
> 		goto again;
>+	}
> 
> 	return rc;
> }
>-- 
>2.9.4