lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <a4707277562862260bdc159bb88dafd6f85a67bc.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de> Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2023 09:55:21 +0100 From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de> To: Finn Thain <fthain@...ux-m68k.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> Cc: Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: Does anyone use Appletalk? On Thu, 2023-11-02 at 13:13 +1100, Finn Thain wrote: > So I can't object to the removal of the localtalk code. But I do object to > the underhand manner in which it is done. I agree. I have the impression that the actual users of the affected code are never asked. It's usually a question posed on a mailing list where 99% of the affected users don't hang around. Naturally, there won't be any objections to the removal because affected users didn't receive a heads-up in the first place. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Powered by blists - more mailing lists