[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CO1PR11MB5059DAD2C742BBA1E3584BE397A4A@CO1PR11MB5059.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2023 02:13:37 +0000
From: "Nowlin, Dan" <dan.nowlin@...el.com>
To: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, "Fijalkowski, Maciej"
<maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, David Miller
<davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, "Brandeburg, Jesse"
<jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, "Greenwalt, Paul" <paul.greenwalt@...el.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, "Brelinski, Tony" <tony.brelinski@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 4/6] ice: Add support for E830 DDP package
segment
> On 11/3/2023 6:46 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 02:41:55PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote:
>>> From: Dan Nowlin <dan.nowlin@...el.com>
>>>
>>> Add support for E830 DDP package segment. For the E830 package,
>>> signature buffers will not be included inline in the configuration
>>> buffers. Instead, the signature buffers will be located in a
>>> signature segment.
>>
>> This breaks E810 usage, they go into safe mode. I'll be sending a
>> revert to this commit or if you have any other idea how to address
>> that I'm all ears.
>>
>
> Do we have any idea why it breaks? A fix might be preferable to a full revert if its simple.
>
> Thanks,
> Jake
Paul and I debugged this and found what is happening:
* Packages that do NOT have a signing segment are not being downloaded.
- Any package before or equal to 1.3.25.0 does not have a signing segment, and thus will not be downloaded.
Paul and I have a patch that fixes this problem.
Can we get the version of the package that is failing to download?
Regards,
Dan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists