netdev - Re: Bypass qdiscs?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 09:51:16 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
 John Ousterhout <ouster@...stanford.edu>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bypass qdiscs?

On 11/6/23 9:17 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> BTW, Homa in-kernel instead of bypass is a better approach because you
> get the advantages of all other infra that the kernel offers..

yes. The memcpy that Homa currently needs (based on the netdevconf talk)
should be avoidable using the recent page pool work (RFCs).