netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v3 02/12] net: page_pool: create hooks for custom page providers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <74c53156-886c-5bf5-672a-c36696d38649@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 15:44:10 +0800
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
To: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
	<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
	<pabeni@...hat.com>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, Ilias
 Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Willem de Bruijn
	<willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Sumit
 Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>, Christian König
	<christian.koenig@....com>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>, Jeroen de
 Borst <jeroendb@...gle.com>, Praveen Kaligineedi <pkaligineedi@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 02/12] net: page_pool: create hooks for custom page
 providers

On 2023/11/6 10:44, Mina Almasry wrote:
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/page_pool/types.h b/include/net/page_pool/types.h
> index 6fc5134095ed..d4bea053bb7e 100644
> --- a/include/net/page_pool/types.h
> +++ b/include/net/page_pool/types.h
> @@ -60,6 +60,8 @@ struct page_pool_params {
>  	int		nid;
>  	struct device	*dev;
>  	struct napi_struct *napi;
> +	u8		memory_provider;
> +	void            *mp_priv;
>  	enum dma_data_direction dma_dir;
>  	unsigned int	max_len;
>  	unsigned int	offset;
> @@ -118,6 +120,19 @@ struct page_pool_stats {
>  };
>  #endif
>  
> +struct mem_provider;

The above doesn't seems be used?

> +
> +enum pp_memory_provider_type {
> +	__PP_MP_NONE, /* Use system allocator directly */
> +};
> +
> +struct pp_memory_provider_ops {

Is it better to rename the above to pp_memory_provider and put the
above memory_provider and mp_priv here? so that all the fields related
to pp_memory_provider are in one place?

It is probably better to provide a register function for driver
to implement its own pp_memory_provider in the future.

> +	int (*init)(struct page_pool *pool);
> +	void (*destroy)(struct page_pool *pool);
> +	struct page *(*alloc_pages)(struct page_pool *pool, gfp_t gfp);
> +	bool (*release_page)(struct page_pool *pool, struct page *page);
> +};
> +