[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231108.194647.1383073631008060059.fujita.tomonori@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2023 19:46:47 +0900 (JST)
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
To: benno.lossin@...ton.me
Cc: fujita.tomonori@...il.com, boqun.feng@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, tmgross@...ch.edu,
miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com, wedsonaf@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 1/5] rust: core abstractions for network
PHY drivers
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 16:45:38 +0000
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me> wrote:
>>> But I would wait until we see a response from the bindgen devs on the issue.
>>
>> You meant that they might have a different option on this?
>
> No, before you implement the workaround that Boqun posted you
> should wait until the bindgen devs say how long/if they will
> implement it.
It has been 10 days but no response from bindgen developpers. I guess
that unlikely bindgen will support the feature until the next merge
window.
I prefer adding accessors in the C side rather than the workaround if
it's fine by Andrew because we have no idea when bindgen will support
the feature.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists