[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1699528202.3090942-4-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 19:10:02 +0800
From: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 17/21] virtio_net: xsk: rx: skip dma unmap when rq is bind with AF_XDP
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 03:15:03 -0500, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 11:12:23AM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > When rq is bound with AF_XDP, the buffer dma is managed
> > by the AF_XDP APIs. So the buffer got from the virtio core should
> > skip the dma unmap operation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
>
> I don't get it - is this like a bugfix?
I want focus on this. So let it as an independent commit.
> And why do we need our own flag and checks?
> Doesn't virtio core DTRT?
struct vring_virtqueue {
[....]
/* Do DMA mapping by driver */
bool premapped;
We can not.
So I add own flag.
Thanks.
>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/virtio/main.c | 8 +++++---
> > drivers/net/virtio/virtio_net.h | 3 +++
> > drivers/net/virtio/xsk.c | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/main.c b/drivers/net/virtio/main.c
> > index 15943a22e17d..a318b2533b94 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio/main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/main.c
> > @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ static void *virtnet_rq_get_buf(struct virtnet_rq *rq, u32 *len, void **ctx)
> > void *buf;
> >
> > buf = virtqueue_get_buf_ctx(rq->vq, len, ctx);
> > - if (buf && rq->do_dma)
> > + if (buf && rq->do_dma_unmap)
> > virtnet_rq_unmap(rq, buf, *len);
> >
> > return buf;
> > @@ -561,8 +561,10 @@ static void virtnet_set_premapped(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> >
> > /* disable for big mode */
> > if (vi->mergeable_rx_bufs || !vi->big_packets) {
> > - if (!virtqueue_set_dma_premapped(vi->rq[i].vq))
> > + if (!virtqueue_set_dma_premapped(vi->rq[i].vq)) {
> > vi->rq[i].do_dma = true;
> > + vi->rq[i].do_dma_unmap = true;
> > + }
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > @@ -3944,7 +3946,7 @@ void virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf)
> >
> > rq = &vi->rq[i];
> >
> > - if (rq->do_dma)
> > + if (rq->do_dma_unmap)
> > virtnet_rq_unmap(rq, buf, 0);
> >
> > virtnet_rq_free_buf(vi, rq, buf);
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_net.h b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_net.h
> > index 1242785e311e..2005d0cd22e2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_net.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_net.h
> > @@ -135,6 +135,9 @@ struct virtnet_rq {
> > /* Do dma by self */
> > bool do_dma;
> >
> > + /* Do dma unmap after getting buf from virtio core. */
> > + bool do_dma_unmap;
> > +
> > struct {
> > struct xsk_buff_pool *pool;
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/xsk.c b/drivers/net/virtio/xsk.c
> > index e737c3353212..b09c473c29fb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio/xsk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/xsk.c
> > @@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ static int virtnet_rq_bind_xsk_pool(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct virtnet_rq *
> > xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rq->xsk.xdp_rxq);
> >
> > rq->xsk.pool = pool;
> > + rq->do_dma_unmap = !pool;
> >
> > virtnet_rx_resume(vi, rq);
> >
> > --
> > 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists