| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAHS8izO1p==W+ppDqwEE9ugehN4OL9J3+fdrY+UJch9s8uShOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 18:25:56 -0800
From: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
To: David Wei <dw@...idwei.uk>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>, Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>, Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@...gle.com>,
Praveen Kaligineedi <pkaligineedi@...gle.com>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Kaiyuan Zhang <kaiyuanz@...gle.com>, Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 04/12] netdev: support binding dma-buf to netdevice
On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 3:47 PM David Wei <dw@...idwei.uk> wrote:
>
> On 2023-11-05 18:44, Mina Almasry wrote:
> > Add a netdev_dmabuf_binding struct which represents the
> > dma-buf-to-netdevice binding. The netlink API will bind the dma-buf to
> > rx queues on the netdevice. On the binding, the dma_buf_attach
> > & dma_buf_map_attachment will occur. The entries in the sg_table from
> > mapping will be inserted into a genpool to make it ready
> > for allocation.
> >
> > The chunks in the genpool are owned by a dmabuf_chunk_owner struct which
> > holds the dma-buf offset of the base of the chunk and the dma_addr of
> > the chunk. Both are needed to use allocations that come from this chunk.
> >
> > We create a new type that represents an allocation from the genpool:
> > page_pool_iov. We setup the page_pool_iov allocation size in the
> > genpool to PAGE_SIZE for simplicity: to match the PAGE_SIZE normally
> > allocated by the page pool and given to the drivers.
> >
> > The user can unbind the dmabuf from the netdevice by closing the netlink
> > socket that established the binding. We do this so that the binding is
> > automatically unbound even if the userspace process crashes.
> >
> > The binding and unbinding leaves an indicator in struct netdev_rx_queue
> > that the given queue is bound, but the binding doesn't take effect until
> > the driver actually reconfigures its queues, and re-initializes its page
> > pool.
> >
> > The netdev_dmabuf_binding struct is refcounted, and releases its
> > resources only when all the refs are released.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kaiyuan Zhang <kaiyuanz@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > RFC v3:
> > - Support multi rx-queue binding
> >
> > ---
> > include/linux/netdevice.h | 80 ++++++++++++++
> > include/net/netdev_rx_queue.h | 1 +
> > include/net/page_pool/types.h | 27 +++++
> > net/core/dev.c | 203 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > net/core/netdev-genl.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++-
> > 5 files changed, 425 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > index b8bf669212cc..eeeda849115c 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@
> > #include <net/net_trackers.h>
> > #include <net/net_debug.h>
> > #include <net/dropreason-core.h>
> > +#include <linux/xarray.h>
> > +#include <linux/refcount.h>
> >
> > struct netpoll_info;
> > struct device;
> > @@ -808,6 +810,84 @@ bool rps_may_expire_flow(struct net_device *dev, u16 rxq_index, u32 flow_id,
> > #endif
> > #endif /* CONFIG_RPS */
> >
> > +struct netdev_dmabuf_binding {
> > + struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
> > + struct dma_buf_attachment *attachment;
> > + struct sg_table *sgt;
> > + struct net_device *dev;
> > + struct gen_pool *chunk_pool;
> > +
> > + /* The user holds a ref (via the netlink API) for as long as they want
> > + * the binding to remain alive. Each page pool using this binding holds
> > + * a ref to keep the binding alive. Each allocated page_pool_iov holds a
> > + * ref.
> > + *
> > + * The binding undos itself and unmaps the underlying dmabuf once all
> > + * those refs are dropped and the binding is no longer desired or in
> > + * use.
> > + */
> > + refcount_t ref;
> > +
> > + /* The portid of the user that owns this binding. Used for netlink to
> > + * notify us of the user dropping the bind.
> > + */
> > + u32 owner_nlportid;
> > +
> > + /* The list of bindings currently active. Used for netlink to notify us
> > + * of the user dropping the bind.
> > + */
> > + struct list_head list;
> > +
> > + /* rxq's this binding is active on. */
> > + struct xarray bound_rxq_list;
> > +};
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_SHARED_BUFFER
> > +void __netdev_devmem_binding_free(struct netdev_dmabuf_binding *binding);
> > +int netdev_bind_dmabuf(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int dmabuf_fd,
> > + struct netdev_dmabuf_binding **out);
> > +void netdev_unbind_dmabuf(struct netdev_dmabuf_binding *binding);
> > +int netdev_bind_dmabuf_to_queue(struct net_device *dev, u32 rxq_idx,
> > + struct netdev_dmabuf_binding *binding);
> > +#else
> > +static inline void
> > +__netdev_devmem_binding_free(struct netdev_dmabuf_binding *binding)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int netdev_bind_dmabuf(struct net_device *dev,
> > + unsigned int dmabuf_fd,
> > + struct netdev_dmabuf_binding **out)
> > +{
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +}
> > +static inline void netdev_unbind_dmabuf(struct netdev_dmabuf_binding *binding)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int
> > +netdev_bind_dmabuf_to_queue(struct net_device *dev, u32 rxq_idx,
> > + struct netdev_dmabuf_binding *binding)
> > +{
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +static inline void
> > +netdev_devmem_binding_get(struct netdev_dmabuf_binding *binding)
> > +{
> > + refcount_inc(&binding->ref);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void
> > +netdev_devmem_binding_put(struct netdev_dmabuf_binding *binding)
> > +{
> > + if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&binding->ref))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + __netdev_devmem_binding_free(binding);
> > +}
> > +
> > /* XPS map type and offset of the xps map within net_device->xps_maps[]. */
> > enum xps_map_type {
> > XPS_CPUS = 0,
> > diff --git a/include/net/netdev_rx_queue.h b/include/net/netdev_rx_queue.h
> > index cdcafb30d437..1bfcf60a145d 100644
> > --- a/include/net/netdev_rx_queue.h
> > +++ b/include/net/netdev_rx_queue.h
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ struct netdev_rx_queue {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_XDP_SOCKETS
> > struct xsk_buff_pool *pool;
> > #endif
> > + struct netdev_dmabuf_binding *binding;
>
> @Pavel - They are using struct netdev_rx_queue to hold the binding,
> which is an object that holds the state and is mapped 1:1 to an rxq.
> This object is similar to our "interface queue". I wonder if we should
> re-visit using this generic struct, instead of driver specific structs
> e.g. bnxt_rx_ring_info?
>
> > } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
> >
> > /*
> > diff --git a/include/net/page_pool/types.h b/include/net/page_pool/types.h
> > index d4bea053bb7e..64386325d965 100644
> > --- a/include/net/page_pool/types.h
> > +++ b/include/net/page_pool/types.h
> > @@ -133,6 +133,33 @@ struct pp_memory_provider_ops {
> > bool (*release_page)(struct page_pool *pool, struct page *page);
> > };
> >
> > +/* page_pool_iov support */
> > +
> > +/* Owner of the dma-buf chunks inserted into the gen pool. Each scatterlist
> > + * entry from the dmabuf is inserted into the genpool as a chunk, and needs
> > + * this owner struct to keep track of some metadata necessary to create
> > + * allocations from this chunk.
> > + */
> > +struct dmabuf_genpool_chunk_owner {
> > + /* Offset into the dma-buf where this chunk starts. */
> > + unsigned long base_virtual;
> > +
> > + /* dma_addr of the start of the chunk. */
> > + dma_addr_t base_dma_addr;
> > +
> > + /* Array of page_pool_iovs for this chunk. */
> > + struct page_pool_iov *ppiovs;
> > + size_t num_ppiovs;
> > +
> > + struct netdev_dmabuf_binding *binding;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct page_pool_iov {
> > + struct dmabuf_genpool_chunk_owner *owner;
> > +
> > + refcount_t refcount;
> > +};
> > +
> > struct page_pool {
> > struct page_pool_params p;
> >
> > diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> > index a37a932a3e14..c8c3709d42c8 100644
> > --- a/net/core/dev.c
> > +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> > @@ -153,6 +153,9 @@
> > #include <linux/prandom.h>
> > #include <linux/once_lite.h>
> > #include <net/netdev_rx_queue.h>
> > +#include <linux/genalloc.h>
> > +#include <linux/dma-buf.h>
> > +#include <net/page_pool/types.h>
> >
> > #include "dev.h"
> > #include "net-sysfs.h"
> > @@ -2040,6 +2043,206 @@ static int call_netdevice_notifiers_mtu(unsigned long val,
> > return call_netdevice_notifiers_info(val, &info.info);
> > }
> >
> > +/* Device memory support */
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_SHARED_BUFFER
> > +static void netdev_devmem_free_chunk_owner(struct gen_pool *genpool,
> > + struct gen_pool_chunk *chunk,
> > + void *not_used)
> > +{
> > + struct dmabuf_genpool_chunk_owner *owner = chunk->owner;
> > +
> > + kvfree(owner->ppiovs);
> > + kfree(owner);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void __netdev_devmem_binding_free(struct netdev_dmabuf_binding *binding)
> > +{
> > + size_t size, avail;
> > +
> > + gen_pool_for_each_chunk(binding->chunk_pool,
> > + netdev_devmem_free_chunk_owner, NULL);
> > +
> > + size = gen_pool_size(binding->chunk_pool);
> > + avail = gen_pool_avail(binding->chunk_pool);
> > +
> > + if (!WARN(size != avail, "can't destroy genpool. size=%lu, avail=%lu",
> > + size, avail))
> > + gen_pool_destroy(binding->chunk_pool);
> > +
> > + dma_buf_unmap_attachment(binding->attachment, binding->sgt,
> > + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > + dma_buf_detach(binding->dmabuf, binding->attachment);
> > + dma_buf_put(binding->dmabuf);
> > + kfree(binding);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void netdev_unbind_dmabuf(struct netdev_dmabuf_binding *binding)
> > +{
> > + struct netdev_rx_queue *rxq;
> > + unsigned long xa_idx;
> > +
> > + if (!binding)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + list_del_rcu(&binding->list);
> > +
> > + xa_for_each(&binding->bound_rxq_list, xa_idx, rxq)
> > + if (rxq->binding == binding)
> > + /* We hold the rtnl_lock while binding/unbinding
> > + * dma-buf, so we can't race with another thread that
> > + * is also modifying this value. However, the driver
> > + * may read this config while it's creating its
> > + * rx-queues. WRITE_ONCE() here to match the
> > + * READ_ONCE() in the driver.
> > + */
> > + WRITE_ONCE(rxq->binding, NULL);
> > +
> > + netdev_devmem_binding_put(binding);
> > +}
> > +
> > +int netdev_bind_dmabuf_to_queue(struct net_device *dev, u32 rxq_idx,
> > + struct netdev_dmabuf_binding *binding)
> > +{
> > + struct netdev_rx_queue *rxq;
> > + u32 xa_idx;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + rxq = __netif_get_rx_queue(dev, rxq_idx);
> > +
> > + if (rxq->binding)
> > + return -EEXIST;
> > +
> > + err = xa_alloc(&binding->bound_rxq_list, &xa_idx, rxq, xa_limit_32b,
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > + /*We hold the rtnl_lock while binding/unbinding dma-buf, so we can't
> > + * race with another thread that is also modifying this value. However,
> > + * the driver may read this config while it's creating its * rx-queues.
> > + * WRITE_ONCE() here to match the READ_ONCE() in the driver.
> > + */
> > + WRITE_ONCE(rxq->binding, binding);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int netdev_bind_dmabuf(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int dmabuf_fd,
> > + struct netdev_dmabuf_binding **out)
>
> I'm not entirely familiar with the Netlink API. Mina, do you know if we
> can call into netdev_bind_dmabuf or netdev_nl_bind_rx_doit directly,
> without needing to call send/recv on a Netlink socket? We likely want
> io_uring to do the registration of a dmabuf fd and keep ownership over
> it.
>
You can likely call into netdev_bind_dmabuf(), but not
netdev_nl_bind_rx_doit. The latter is very netlink specific.
> > +{
> > + struct netdev_dmabuf_binding *binding;
> > + struct scatterlist *sg;
> > + struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
> > + unsigned int sg_idx, i;
> > + unsigned long virtual;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
> > + return -EPERM;
> > +
> > + dmabuf = dma_buf_get(dmabuf_fd);
> > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dmabuf))
> > + return -EBADFD;
> > +
> > + binding = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*binding), GFP_KERNEL,
> > + dev_to_node(&dev->dev));
> > + if (!binding) {
> > + err = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto err_put_dmabuf;
> > + }
> > +
> > + xa_init_flags(&binding->bound_rxq_list, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
> > +
> > + refcount_set(&binding->ref, 1);
> > +
> > + binding->dmabuf = dmabuf;
> > +
> > + binding->attachment = dma_buf_attach(binding->dmabuf, dev->dev.parent);
> > + if (IS_ERR(binding->attachment)) {
> > + err = PTR_ERR(binding->attachment);
> > + goto err_free_binding;
> > + }
> > +
> > + binding->sgt = dma_buf_map_attachment(binding->attachment,
> > + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > + if (IS_ERR(binding->sgt)) {
> > + err = PTR_ERR(binding->sgt);
> > + goto err_detach;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* For simplicity we expect to make PAGE_SIZE allocations, but the
> > + * binding can be much more flexible than that. We may be able to
> > + * allocate MTU sized chunks here. Leave that for future work...
> > + */
> > + binding->chunk_pool = gen_pool_create(PAGE_SHIFT,
> > + dev_to_node(&dev->dev));
> > + if (!binding->chunk_pool) {
> > + err = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto err_unmap;
> > + }
> > +
> > + virtual = 0;
> > + for_each_sgtable_dma_sg(binding->sgt, sg, sg_idx) {
> > + dma_addr_t dma_addr = sg_dma_address(sg);
> > + struct dmabuf_genpool_chunk_owner *owner;
> > + size_t len = sg_dma_len(sg);
> > + struct page_pool_iov *ppiov;
> > +
> > + owner = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*owner), GFP_KERNEL,
> > + dev_to_node(&dev->dev));
> > + owner->base_virtual = virtual;
> > + owner->base_dma_addr = dma_addr;
> > + owner->num_ppiovs = len / PAGE_SIZE;
> > + owner->binding = binding;
> > +
> > + err = gen_pool_add_owner(binding->chunk_pool, dma_addr,
> > + dma_addr, len, dev_to_node(&dev->dev),
> > + owner);
> > + if (err) {
> > + err = -EINVAL;
> > + goto err_free_chunks;
> > + }
> > +
> > + owner->ppiovs = kvmalloc_array(owner->num_ppiovs,
> > + sizeof(*owner->ppiovs),
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!owner->ppiovs) {
> > + err = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto err_free_chunks;
> > + }
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < owner->num_ppiovs; i++) {
> > + ppiov = &owner->ppiovs[i];
> > + ppiov->owner = owner;
> > + refcount_set(&ppiov->refcount, 1);
> > + }
> > +
> > + dma_addr += len;
> > + virtual += len;
> > + }
> > +
> > + *out = binding;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +err_free_chunks:
> > + gen_pool_for_each_chunk(binding->chunk_pool,
> > + netdev_devmem_free_chunk_owner, NULL);
> > + gen_pool_destroy(binding->chunk_pool);
> > +err_unmap:
> > + dma_buf_unmap_attachment(binding->attachment, binding->sgt,
> > + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > +err_detach:
> > + dma_buf_detach(dmabuf, binding->attachment);
> > +err_free_binding:
> > + kfree(binding);
> > +err_put_dmabuf:
> > + dma_buf_put(dmabuf);
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +
> > #ifdef CONFIG_NET_INGRESS
> > static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(ingress_needed_key);
> >
> > diff --git a/net/core/netdev-genl.c b/net/core/netdev-genl.c
> > index 59d3d512d9cc..2c2a62593217 100644
> > --- a/net/core/netdev-genl.c
> > +++ b/net/core/netdev-genl.c
> > @@ -129,10 +129,89 @@ int netdev_nl_dev_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
> > return skb->len;
> > }
> >
> > -/* Stub */
> > +static LIST_HEAD(netdev_rbinding_list);
> > +
> > int netdev_nl_bind_rx_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> > {
> > - return 0;
> > + struct netdev_dmabuf_binding *out_binding;
> > + u32 ifindex, dmabuf_fd, rxq_idx;
> > + struct net_device *netdev;
> > + struct sk_buff *rsp;
> > + int rem, err = 0;
> > + void *hdr;
> > + struct nlattr *attr;
> > +
> > + if (GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, NETDEV_A_DEV_IFINDEX) ||
> > + GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, NETDEV_A_BIND_DMABUF_DMABUF_FD) ||
> > + GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, NETDEV_A_BIND_DMABUF_QUEUES))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + ifindex = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[NETDEV_A_DEV_IFINDEX]);
> > + dmabuf_fd = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[NETDEV_A_BIND_DMABUF_DMABUF_FD]);
> > +
> > + rtnl_lock();
> > +
> > + netdev = __dev_get_by_index(genl_info_net(info), ifindex);
> > + if (!netdev) {
> > + err = -ENODEV;
> > + goto err_unlock;
> > + }
> > +
> > + err = netdev_bind_dmabuf(netdev, dmabuf_fd, &out_binding);
> > + if (err)
> > + goto err_unlock;
> > +
> > + nla_for_each_attr(attr, genlmsg_data(info->genlhdr),
> > + genlmsg_len(info->genlhdr), rem) {
> > + switch (nla_type(attr)) {
> > + case NETDEV_A_BIND_DMABUF_QUEUES:
> > + rxq_idx = nla_get_u32(attr);
> > +
> > + if (rxq_idx >= netdev->num_rx_queues) {
> > + err = -ERANGE;
> > + goto err_unbind;
> > + }
> > +
> > + err = netdev_bind_dmabuf_to_queue(netdev, rxq_idx,
> > + out_binding);
> > + if (err)
> > + goto err_unbind;
> > +
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + out_binding->owner_nlportid = info->snd_portid;
> > + list_add_rcu(&out_binding->list, &netdev_rbinding_list);
> > +
> > + rsp = genlmsg_new(GENLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!rsp) {
> > + err = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto err_unbind;
> > + }
> > +
> > + hdr = genlmsg_put(rsp, info->snd_portid, info->snd_seq,
> > + &netdev_nl_family, 0, info->genlhdr->cmd);
> > + if (!hdr) {
> > + err = -EMSGSIZE;
> > + goto err_genlmsg_free;
> > + }
> > +
> > + genlmsg_end(rsp, hdr);
> > +
> > + rtnl_unlock();
> > +
> > + return genlmsg_reply(rsp, info);
> > +
> > +err_genlmsg_free:
> > + nlmsg_free(rsp);
> > +err_unbind:
> > + netdev_unbind_dmabuf(out_binding);
> > +err_unlock:
> > + rtnl_unlock();
> > + return err;
> > }
> >
> > static int netdev_genl_netdevice_event(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > @@ -155,10 +234,37 @@ static int netdev_genl_netdevice_event(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > return NOTIFY_OK;
> > }
> >
> > +static int netdev_netlink_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long state,
> > + void *_notify)
> > +{
> > + struct netlink_notify *notify = _notify;
> > + struct netdev_dmabuf_binding *rbinding;
> > +
> > + if (state != NETLINK_URELEASE || notify->protocol != NETLINK_GENERIC)
> > + return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > +
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry_rcu(rbinding, &netdev_rbinding_list, list) {
> > + if (rbinding->owner_nlportid == notify->portid) {
> > + netdev_unbind_dmabuf(rbinding);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > +
> > + return NOTIFY_OK;
> > +}
> > +
> > static struct notifier_block netdev_genl_nb = {
> > .notifier_call = netdev_genl_netdevice_event,
> > };
> >
> > +static struct notifier_block netdev_netlink_notifier = {
> > + .notifier_call = netdev_netlink_notify,
> > +};
>
> Is this mechamism what cleans up TCP devmem in case userspace crashes
> and the associated Netlink socket is closed?
>
Correct.
> > +
> > static int __init netdev_genl_init(void)
> > {
> > int err;
> > @@ -171,8 +277,14 @@ static int __init netdev_genl_init(void)
> > if (err)
> > goto err_unreg_ntf;
> >
> > + err = netlink_register_notifier(&netdev_netlink_notifier);
> > + if (err)
> > + goto err_unreg_family;
> > +
> > return 0;
> >
> > +err_unreg_family:
> > + genl_unregister_family(&netdev_nl_family);
> > err_unreg_ntf:
> > unregister_netdevice_notifier(&netdev_genl_nb);
> > return err;
--
Thanks,
Mina
Powered by blists - more mailing lists