[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231109071850.053f04a7@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 07:18:50 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Daniele Palmas <dnlplm@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, syzbot+d55372214aff0faa1f1f@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next] net: don't dump stack on queue timeout
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:40:00 +0100 Daniele Palmas wrote:
> For example, I can see the splat with MBIM modems when radio link
> failure happens, something for which the host can't really do
> anything. So, the main result of using WARN is to scare the users who
> are not aware of the reasons behind it and create unneeded support
> requests...
Is it not possible to clear the carrier on downstream devices?
Radio link failure sounds like carrier loss.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists