[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231110120513.45ed505c@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 12:05:13 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
Cc: "longli@...uxonhyperv.com" <longli@...uxonhyperv.com>, KY Srinivasan
<kys@...rosoft.com>, Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, Wei Liu
<wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4] hv_netvsc: Mark VF as slave before exposing
it to user-mode
On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 00:43:55 +0000 Long Li wrote:
> The code above needs to work with and without netvsc (the possible
> master device) present.
I don't think that's a reasonable requirement for the kernel code.
The auto-bonding already puts the kernel into business of guessing
policy, which frankly we shouldn't be in.
Having the kernel guess even harder that there will be a master,
but it's not there yet, is not reasonable.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists