| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1699581525.5133314-4-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 09:58:45 +0800
From: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] virtio_net: fix missing dma unmap for resize
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 07:06:16 -0500, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 04:18:32PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > For rq, we have three cases getting buffers from virtio core:
> >
> > 1. virtqueue_get_buf{,_ctx}
> > 2. virtqueue_detach_unused_buf
> > 3. callback for virtqueue_resize
> >
> > But in commit 295525e29a5b("virtio_net: merge dma operations when
> > filling mergeable buffers"), I missed the dma unmap for the #3 case.
> >
> > That will leak some memory, because I did not release the pages referred
> > by the unused buffers.
> >
> > If we do such script, we will make the system OOM.
> >
> > while true
> > do
> > ethtool -G ens4 rx 128
> > ethtool -G ens4 rx 256
> > free -m
> > done
> >
> > Fixes: 295525e29a5b ("virtio_net: merge dma operations when filling mergeable buffers")
> > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > index d16f592c2061..6423a3a007ce 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > @@ -408,6 +408,17 @@ static struct page *get_a_page(struct receive_queue *rq, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> > return p;
> > }
> >
> > +static void virtnet_rq_free_buf(struct virtnet_info *vi,
> > + struct receive_queue *rq, void *buf)
> > +{
> > + if (vi->mergeable_rx_bufs)
> > + put_page(virt_to_head_page(buf));
> > + else if (vi->big_packets)
> > + give_pages(rq, buf);
> > + else
> > + put_page(virt_to_head_page(buf));
> > +}
> > +
>
> > static void enable_delayed_refill(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> > {
> > spin_lock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
> > @@ -634,17 +645,6 @@ static void *virtnet_rq_get_buf(struct receive_queue *rq, u32 *len, void **ctx)
> > return buf;
> > }
> >
> > -static void *virtnet_rq_detach_unused_buf(struct receive_queue *rq)
> > -{
> > - void *buf;
> > -
> > - buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(rq->vq);
> > - if (buf && rq->do_dma)
> > - virtnet_rq_unmap(rq, buf, 0);
> > -
> > - return buf;
> > -}
> > -
> > static void virtnet_rq_init_one_sg(struct receive_queue *rq, void *buf, u32 len)
> > {
> > struct virtnet_rq_dma *dma;
> > @@ -1764,7 +1764,7 @@ static void receive_buf(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
> > if (unlikely(len < vi->hdr_len + ETH_HLEN)) {
> > pr_debug("%s: short packet %i\n", dev->name, len);
> > DEV_STATS_INC(dev, rx_length_errors);
> > - virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf(rq->vq, buf);
> > + virtnet_rq_free_buf(vi, rq, buf);
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -4034,14 +4034,15 @@ static void virtnet_sq_free_unused_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf)
> > static void virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf)
> > {
> > struct virtnet_info *vi = vq->vdev->priv;
> > + struct receive_queue *rq;
> > int i = vq2rxq(vq);
> >
> > - if (vi->mergeable_rx_bufs)
> > - put_page(virt_to_head_page(buf));
> > - else if (vi->big_packets)
> > - give_pages(&vi->rq[i], buf);
> > - else
> > - put_page(virt_to_head_page(buf));
> > + rq = &vi->rq[i];
> > +
> > + if (rq->do_dma)
> > + virtnet_rq_unmap(rq, buf, 0);
> > +
> > + virtnet_rq_free_buf(vi, rq, buf);
> > }
> >
>
> So we have virtnet_rq_free_buf which sounds like it should free any
> buf, and we have virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf which is only for unused.
> Or so it would seem from names but this is not true.
> Better function names?
Sorry. not get it.
virtnet_rq_free_buf() that free the buf passed in. That is called by
virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf or receive_buf to free the buffer. I think
the name is right.
virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf is called by free_unused_bufs() and the
virtqueue_resize() to free the unused bufs. I think this name is right also.
So I do not get your mean.
Are there any details I've overlooked?
Thanks.
>
> > static void free_unused_bufs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> > @@ -4057,10 +4058,10 @@ static void free_unused_bufs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> > }
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> > - struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i];
> > + struct virtqueue *vq = vi->rq[i].vq;
> >
> > - while ((buf = virtnet_rq_detach_unused_buf(rq)) != NULL)
> > - virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf(rq->vq, buf);
> > + while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vq)) != NULL)
> > + virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf(vq, buf);
> > cond_resched();
> > }
> > }
> > --
> > 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists