[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9bdbe85d-b45f-407c-8763-42439bc096e2@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2023 08:39:22 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, alsi@...g-olufsen.dk, andrew@...n.ch,
vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, olteanv@...il.com,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, arinc.unal@...nc9.com
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 3/5] net: dsa: realtek: create realtek-common
On 11/11/2023 22:51, Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca wrote:
> ret = priv->ops->detect(priv);
> if (ret) {
> @@ -218,18 +149,12 @@ static int realtek_mdio_probe(struct mdio_device *mdiodev)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - priv->ds = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv->ds), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!priv->ds)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - priv->ds->dev = dev;
> priv->ds->num_ports = priv->num_ports;
> - priv->ds->priv = priv;
> - priv->ds->ops = var->ds_ops_mdio;
>
> ret = dsa_register_switch(priv->ds);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(priv->dev, "unable to register switch ret = %d\n", ret);
> + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "unable to register switch ret = %pe\n",
> + ERR_PTR(ret));
This is some weird code. Why do you print ret twice? This was not
explained in the commit msg.
...
> - priv->ds->ops = var->ds_ops_smi;
> ret = dsa_register_switch(priv->ds);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "unable to register switch\n");
> + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "unable to register switch ret = %pe\n",
> + ERR_PTR(ret));
Same problem.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists