lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2023 09:48:19 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxtram95@...il.com>, "Chittim, Madhu"
	 <madhu.chittim@...el.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, Cong Wang
 <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Tariq
 Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,  Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>, Saeed Mahameed
 <saeedm@...dia.com>, xuejun.zhang@...el.com,  sridhar.samudrala@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: sched: fix warn on htb offloaded class creation

On Fri, 2023-11-10 at 13:07 +0200, Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Nov 2023 at 13:54:17 -0800, Chittim, Madhu wrote:
> > We would like to enable Tx rate limiting using htb offload on all the
> > existing queues.
> 
> I don't seem to understand how you see it possible with HTB.

I must admit I feel sorry for not being able to join any of the
upcoming conferences, but to me it looks like there is some
communication gap that could be filled by in-person discussion.

Specifically the above to me sounds contradictory to what you stated
here:

https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ZUEQzsKiIlgtbN-S@mail.gmail.com/

"""
> Can HTB actually configure H/W shaping on
> real_num_tx_queues?

It will be on real_num_tx_queues, but after it's increased to add new
HTB queues. The original queues [0, N) are used for direct traffic,
same as the non-offloaded HTB's direct_queue (it's not shaped).
"""

> What is your goal? 

We are looking for clean interface to configure individually min/max
shaping on each TX queue for a given netdev (actually virtual
function).

Jiri's suggested to use TC:

https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ZOTVkXWCLY88YfjV@nanopsycho/

which IMHO makes sense as far as there is an existing interface (qdisc)
providing the required features (almost) out-of-the-box. It looks like
it's not the case.

If a non trivial configuration and/or significant implementation are
required, IMHO other options could be better...

> If you need shaping for the whole netdev, maybe HTB
> is not needed, and it's enough to attach a catchall filter with the
> police action? Or use /sys/class/net/eth0/queues/tx-*/tx_maxrate
> per-queue?

... specifically this latter one (it will require implementing in-
kernel support for 'max_rate', but should quite straight-forward).

It would be great to converge on some agreement on the way forward,
thanks!

Paolo


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ