lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <33102cbb65e24c5c17eda06ce9ac912a91f8d03c.camel@geanix.com> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 14:31:20 +0100 From: Martin Hundebøll <martin@...nix.com> To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de> Cc: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>, Chandrasekar Ramakrishnan <rcsekar@...sung.com>, Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>, Vincent MAILHOL <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>, Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Julien Panis <jpanis@...libre.com>, Judith Mendez <jm@...com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/14] can: m_can: Optimizations for m_can/tcan part 2 On Mon, 2023-11-13 at 14:30 +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 13.11.2023 14:25:37, Martin Hundebøll wrote: > > On Fri, 2023-09-29 at 16:12 +0200, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote: > > > Hi Marc, Simon, Martin and everyone, > > > > > > v6 is a rebase on v6.6. As there was a conflicting change merged > > > for > > > v6.6 which introduced irq polling, I had to modify the patches > > > that > > > touch the hrtimer. > > > > > > @Simon: I removed a couple of your reviewed-by tags because of > > > the > > > changes. > > > > > > @Martin: as the functionality changed, I did not apply your > > > Tested-by > > > tag as I may have introduced new bugs with the changes. > > > > > > The series implements many small and bigger throughput > > > improvements > > > and > > > adds rx/tx coalescing at the end. > > > > > > Based on v6.6-rc2. Also available at > > > https://gitlab.baylibre.com/msp8/linux/-/tree/topic/mcan-optimization/v6.6?ref_type=heads > > > > For the whole series: > > Tested-by: Martin Hundebøll <martin@...nix.com> > > On which hardware? On an mmio mapped m_can or the tcan4x5x? tcan4x5x on a custom iMX6UL. Sorry for mentioning it. // Martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists