| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <IA1PR11MB65141693FD1808D40560A4FC8FB3A@IA1PR11MB6514.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 06:42:09 +0000
From: "Vyavahare, Tushar" <tushar.vyavahare@...el.com>
To: "Fijalkowski, Maciej" <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
CC: "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "bjorn@...nel.org" <bjorn@...nel.org>, "Karlsson,
Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>, "jonathan.lemon@...il.com"
<jonathan.lemon@...il.com>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>, "daniel@...earbox.net"
<daniel@...earbox.net>, "Sarkar, Tirthendu" <tirthendu.sarkar@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/xsk: fix for SEND_RECEIVE_UNALIGNED
test.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fijalkowski, Maciej <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2023 8:01 PM
> To: Vyavahare, Tushar <tushar.vyavahare@...el.com>
> Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; bjorn@...nel.org; Karlsson,
> Magnus <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>; jonathan.lemon@...il.com;
> davem@...emloft.net; kuba@...nel.org; pabeni@...hat.com;
> ast@...nel.org; daniel@...earbox.net; Sarkar, Tirthendu
> <tirthendu.sarkar@...el.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/xsk: fix for SEND_RECEIVE_UNALIGNED
> test.
>
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 02:29:36PM +0000, Tushar Vyavahare wrote:
> > Fix test broken by shared umem test and framework enhancement commit.
> >
> > Correct the current implementation of pkt_stream_replace_half() by
> > ensuring that nb_valid_entries are not set to half, as this is not
> > true for all the tests.
>
> Please be more specific - so what is the expected value for nb_valid_entries for
> unaligned mode test then, if not the half?
>
The expected value for nb_valid_entries for the SEND_RECEIVE_UNALIGNED
test would be equal to the total number of packets sent.
> >
> > Create a new function called pkt_modify() that allows for packet
> > modification to meet specific requirements while ensuring the accurate
> > maintenance of the valid packet count to prevent inconsistencies in
> > packet tracking.
> >
> > Fixes: 6d198a89c004 ("selftests/xsk: Add a test for shared umem
> > feature")
> > Reported-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tushar Vyavahare <tushar.vyavahare@...el.com>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c | 71
> > ++++++++++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
> > b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
> > index 591ca9637b23..f7d3a4a9013f 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
> > @@ -634,16 +634,35 @@ static u32 pkt_nb_frags(u32 frame_size, struct
> pkt_stream *pkt_stream, struct pk
> > return nb_frags;
> > }
> >
> > -static void pkt_set(struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream, struct pkt *pkt,
> > int offset, u32 len)
> > +static bool pkt_valid(bool unaligned_mode, int offset, u32 len)
>
> kinda confusing to have is_pkt_valid() and pkt_valid() functions...
> maybe name this as set_pkt_valid() ? doesn't help much but anyways.
>
will do it.
> > +{
> > + if (len > MAX_ETH_JUMBO_SIZE || (!unaligned_mode && offset < 0))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void pkt_set(struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream, struct xsk_umem_info
> *umem, struct pkt *pkt,
> > + int offset, u32 len)
>
> How about adding a bool unaligned to pkt_stream instead of passing whole
> xsk_umem_info to pkt_set - wouldn't this make the diff smaller?
>
We can also do it this way, but in this case, the difference will be
larger. Wherever we are using "struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream," we must set
this bool flag again. For example, in places like
__pkt_stream_replace_half(), __pkt_stream_generate_custom() , and a few
more. I believe we should stick with the current approach.
> > {
> > pkt->offset = offset;
> > pkt->len = len;
> > - if (len > MAX_ETH_JUMBO_SIZE) {
> > - pkt->valid = false;
> > - } else {
> > - pkt->valid = true;
> > +
> > + pkt->valid = pkt_valid(umem->unaligned_mode, offset, len);
> > + if (pkt->valid)
> > pkt_stream->nb_valid_entries++;
> > - }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void pkt_modify(struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream, struct
> xsk_umem_info *umem, struct pkt *pkt,
> > + int offset, u32 len)
> > +{
> > + bool mod_valid;
> > +
> > + pkt->offset = offset;
> > + pkt->len = len;
> > + mod_valid = pkt_valid(umem->unaligned_mode, offset, len);
>
> double space
>
will do it.
> > + pkt_stream->nb_valid_entries += mod_valid - pkt->valid;
> > + pkt->valid = mod_valid;
> > }
> >
> > static u32 pkt_get_buffer_len(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, u32 len) @@
> > -651,7 +670,8 @@ static u32 pkt_get_buffer_len(struct xsk_umem_info
> *umem, u32 len)
> > return ceil_u32(len, umem->frame_size) * umem->frame_size; }
> >
> > -static struct pkt_stream *__pkt_stream_generate(u32 nb_pkts, u32
> > pkt_len, u32 nb_start, u32 nb_off)
> > +static struct pkt_stream *__pkt_stream_generate(struct xsk_umem_info
> *umem, u32 nb_pkts,
> > + u32 pkt_len, u32 nb_start,
> u32 nb_off)
> > {
> > struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream;
> > u32 i;
> > @@ -665,30 +685,31 @@ static struct pkt_stream
> *__pkt_stream_generate(u32 nb_pkts, u32 pkt_len, u32 nb
> > for (i = 0; i < nb_pkts; i++) {
> > struct pkt *pkt = &pkt_stream->pkts[i];
> >
> > - pkt_set(pkt_stream, pkt, 0, pkt_len);
> > + pkt_set(pkt_stream, umem, pkt, 0, pkt_len);
> > pkt->pkt_nb = nb_start + i * nb_off;
> > }
> >
> > return pkt_stream;
> > }
> >
> > -static struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream_generate(u32 nb_pkts, u32
> > pkt_len)
> > +static struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream_generate(struct xsk_umem_info
> > +*umem, u32 nb_pkts, u32 pkt_len)
> > {
> > - return __pkt_stream_generate(nb_pkts, pkt_len, 0, 1);
> > + return __pkt_stream_generate(umem, nb_pkts, pkt_len, 0, 1);
> > }
> >
> > -static struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream_clone(struct pkt_stream
> > *pkt_stream)
> > +static struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream_clone(struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream,
> > + struct xsk_umem_info *umem)
> > {
> > - return pkt_stream_generate(pkt_stream->nb_pkts, pkt_stream-
> >pkts[0].len);
> > + return pkt_stream_generate(umem, pkt_stream->nb_pkts,
> > +pkt_stream->pkts[0].len);
> > }
> >
> > static void pkt_stream_replace(struct test_spec *test, u32 nb_pkts,
> > u32 pkt_len) {
> > struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream;
> >
> > - pkt_stream = pkt_stream_generate(nb_pkts, pkt_len);
> > + pkt_stream = pkt_stream_generate(test->ifobj_rx->umem, nb_pkts,
> > +pkt_len);
> > test->ifobj_tx->xsk->pkt_stream = pkt_stream;
> > - pkt_stream = pkt_stream_generate(nb_pkts, pkt_len);
> > + pkt_stream = pkt_stream_generate(test->ifobj_tx->umem, nb_pkts,
> > +pkt_len);
> > test->ifobj_rx->xsk->pkt_stream = pkt_stream; }
> >
> > @@ -698,12 +719,11 @@ static void __pkt_stream_replace_half(struct
> ifobject *ifobj, u32 pkt_len,
> > struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream;
> > u32 i;
> >
> > - pkt_stream = pkt_stream_clone(ifobj->xsk->pkt_stream);
> > + pkt_stream = pkt_stream_clone(ifobj->xsk->pkt_stream, ifobj-
> >umem);
> > for (i = 1; i < ifobj->xsk->pkt_stream->nb_pkts; i += 2)
> > - pkt_set(pkt_stream, &pkt_stream->pkts[i], offset, pkt_len);
> > + pkt_modify(pkt_stream, ifobj->umem, &pkt_stream->pkts[i],
> offset,
> > +pkt_len);
> >
> > ifobj->xsk->pkt_stream = pkt_stream;
> > - pkt_stream->nb_valid_entries /= 2;
> > }
> >
> > static void pkt_stream_replace_half(struct test_spec *test, u32
> > pkt_len, int offset) @@ -715,9 +735,10 @@ static void
> > pkt_stream_replace_half(struct test_spec *test, u32 pkt_len, int off
> > static void pkt_stream_receive_half(struct test_spec *test) {
> > struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream = test->ifobj_tx->xsk->pkt_stream;
> > + struct xsk_umem_info *umem = test->ifobj_rx->umem;
> > u32 i;
> >
> > - test->ifobj_rx->xsk->pkt_stream = pkt_stream_generate(pkt_stream-
> >nb_pkts,
> > + test->ifobj_rx->xsk->pkt_stream = pkt_stream_generate(umem,
> > +pkt_stream->nb_pkts,
> > pkt_stream-
> >pkts[0].len);
> > pkt_stream = test->ifobj_rx->xsk->pkt_stream;
> > for (i = 1; i < pkt_stream->nb_pkts; i += 2) @@ -733,12 +754,12 @@
> > static void pkt_stream_even_odd_sequence(struct test_spec *test)
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < test->nb_sockets; i++) {
> > pkt_stream = test->ifobj_tx->xsk_arr[i].pkt_stream;
> > - pkt_stream = __pkt_stream_generate(pkt_stream->nb_pkts /
> 2,
> > + pkt_stream = __pkt_stream_generate(test->ifobj_tx->umem,
> > +pkt_stream->nb_pkts / 2,
> > pkt_stream->pkts[0].len, i,
> 2);
> > test->ifobj_tx->xsk_arr[i].pkt_stream = pkt_stream;
> >
> > pkt_stream = test->ifobj_rx->xsk_arr[i].pkt_stream;
> > - pkt_stream = __pkt_stream_generate(pkt_stream->nb_pkts /
> 2,
> > + pkt_stream = __pkt_stream_generate(test->ifobj_rx->umem,
> > +pkt_stream->nb_pkts / 2,
> > pkt_stream->pkts[0].len, i,
> 2);
> > test->ifobj_rx->xsk_arr[i].pkt_stream = pkt_stream;
> > }
> > @@ -1961,7 +1982,8 @@ static int testapp_stats_tx_invalid_descs(struct
> > test_spec *test) static int testapp_stats_rx_full(struct test_spec
> > *test) {
> > pkt_stream_replace(test, DEFAULT_UMEM_BUFFERS +
> DEFAULT_UMEM_BUFFERS / 2, MIN_PKT_SIZE);
> > - test->ifobj_rx->xsk->pkt_stream =
> pkt_stream_generate(DEFAULT_UMEM_BUFFERS, MIN_PKT_SIZE);
> > + test->ifobj_rx->xsk->pkt_stream = pkt_stream_generate(test-
> >ifobj_rx->umem,
> > +
> DEFAULT_UMEM_BUFFERS, MIN_PKT_SIZE);
> >
> > test->ifobj_rx->xsk->rxqsize = DEFAULT_UMEM_BUFFERS;
> > test->ifobj_rx->release_rx = false;
> > @@ -1972,7 +1994,8 @@ static int testapp_stats_rx_full(struct
> > test_spec *test) static int testapp_stats_fill_empty(struct test_spec
> > *test) {
> > pkt_stream_replace(test, DEFAULT_UMEM_BUFFERS +
> DEFAULT_UMEM_BUFFERS / 2, MIN_PKT_SIZE);
> > - test->ifobj_rx->xsk->pkt_stream =
> pkt_stream_generate(DEFAULT_UMEM_BUFFERS, MIN_PKT_SIZE);
> > + test->ifobj_rx->xsk->pkt_stream = pkt_stream_generate(test-
> >ifobj_rx->umem,
> > +
> DEFAULT_UMEM_BUFFERS, MIN_PKT_SIZE);
> >
> > test->ifobj_rx->use_fill_ring = false;
> > test->ifobj_rx->validation_func = validate_fill_empty; @@ -2526,8
> > +2549,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > init_iface(ifobj_tx, worker_testapp_validate_tx);
> >
> > test_spec_init(&test, ifobj_tx, ifobj_rx, 0, &tests[0]);
> > - tx_pkt_stream_default = pkt_stream_generate(DEFAULT_PKT_CNT,
> MIN_PKT_SIZE);
> > - rx_pkt_stream_default = pkt_stream_generate(DEFAULT_PKT_CNT,
> MIN_PKT_SIZE);
> > + tx_pkt_stream_default = pkt_stream_generate(ifobj_tx->umem,
> DEFAULT_PKT_CNT, MIN_PKT_SIZE);
> > + rx_pkt_stream_default = pkt_stream_generate(ifobj_rx->umem,
> > +DEFAULT_PKT_CNT, MIN_PKT_SIZE);
> > if (!tx_pkt_stream_default || !rx_pkt_stream_default)
> > exit_with_error(ENOMEM);
> > test.tx_pkt_stream_default = tx_pkt_stream_default;
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists