[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZVTbccC0VhT4CetU@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 16:53:37 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, jacob.e.keller@...el.com,
jhs@...atatu.com, johannes@...solutions.net,
amritha.nambiar@...el.com, sdf@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 6/8] genetlink: introduce helpers to do filtered
multicast
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 03:17:22PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
>
> Currently it is possible for netlink kernel user to pass custom
> filter function to broadcast send function netlink_broadcast_filtered().
> However, this is not exposed to multicast send and to generic
> netlink users.
>
> Extend the api and introduce a netlink helper nlmsg_multicast_filtered()
> and a generic netlink helper genlmsg_multicast_netns_filtered()
> to allow generic netlink families to specify filter function
> while sending multicast messages.
...
> +/**
> + * genlmsg_multicast_netns_filtered - multicast a netlink message
> + * to a specific netns with filter
> + * function
> + * @family: the generic netlink family
> + * @net: the net namespace
> + * @skb: netlink message as socket buffer
> + * @portid: own netlink portid to avoid sending to yourself
> + * @group: offset of multicast group in groups array
> + * @flags: allocation flags
> + * @filter: filter function
> + * @filter_data: filter function private data
scripts/kernel-doc -v -none -Wall ...
will complain.
> + */
...
> + int (*filter)(struct sock *dsk,
> + struct sk_buff *skb,
> + void *data),
Since it occurs more than once, perhaps
typedef int (*genlmsg_filter_fn)(struct sock *, struct sk_buff *, void *);
?
...
> /**
> - * nlmsg_multicast - multicast a netlink message
> + * nlmsg_multicast_filtered - multicast a netlink message with filter function
> * @sk: netlink socket to spread messages to
> * @skb: netlink message as socket buffer
> * @portid: own netlink portid to avoid sending to yourself
> * @group: multicast group id
> * @flags: allocation flags
> + * @filter: filter function
> + * @filter_data: filter function private data
I believe same complain by kernel-doc here and in more places...
Can you at least make sure your patches do not add new ones and removes ones
where you touch the code?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists