netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC 3/8] memory-provider: dmabuf devmem memory provider

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6f5b2c30-8336-4e03-9239-be2be736a09f@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 07:46:56 +0100
From: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
Cc: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
 Kaiyuan Zhang <kaiyuanz@...gle.com>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
 <hawk@...nel.org>, Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
 Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/8] memory-provider: dmabuf devmem memory provider

Am 14.11.23 um 14:16 schrieb Jason Gunthorpe:
> A non-mm owned struct page should not be
> passed into mm calls. It is just way too hacky to be seriously
> considered :(

Can we please print this sentence on T-Shirts? Or framed on the wall of 
meeting rooms?

I don't know how often I had to repeat that to people.

Regards,
Christian.