netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] virtio/vsock: send credit update during setting SO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 12:08:52 +0100
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...utedevices.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, 
	Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...rdevices.ru, 
	oxffffaa@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] virtio/vsock: send credit update during
 setting SO_RCVLOWAT

On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 10:20:03AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>This adds sending credit update message when SO_RCVLOWAT is updated and
>it is bigger than number of bytes in rx queue. It is needed, because
>'poll()' will wait until number of bytes in rx queue will be not smaller
>than SO_RCVLOWAT, so kick sender to send more data. Otherwise mutual
>hungup for tx/rx is possible: sender waits for free space and receiver
>is waiting data in 'poll()'.
>
>Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...utedevices.com>
>---
> drivers/vhost/vsock.c                   |  2 ++
> include/linux/virtio_vsock.h            |  1 +
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c        |  2 ++
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c          |  2 ++
> 5 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>index f75731396b7e..ecfa5c11f5ee 100644
>--- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>+++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>@@ -451,6 +451,8 @@ static struct virtio_transport vhost_transport = {
> 		.notify_buffer_size       = virtio_transport_notify_buffer_size,
>
> 		.read_skb = virtio_transport_read_skb,
>+
>+		.set_rcvlowat             = virtio_transport_set_rcvlowat
> 	},
>
> 	.send_pkt = vhost_transport_send_pkt,
>diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
>index ebb3ce63d64d..97dc1bebc69c 100644
>--- a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
>+++ b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
>@@ -256,4 +256,5 @@ void virtio_transport_put_credit(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs, u32 credit);
> void virtio_transport_deliver_tap_pkt(struct sk_buff *skb);
> int virtio_transport_purge_skbs(void *vsk, struct sk_buff_head *list);
> int virtio_transport_read_skb(struct vsock_sock *vsk, skb_read_actor_t read_actor);
>+int virtio_transport_set_rcvlowat(struct vsock_sock *vsk, int val);
> #endif /* _LINUX_VIRTIO_VSOCK_H */
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
>index af5bab1acee1..cf3431189d0c 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
>@@ -539,6 +539,8 @@ static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = {
> 		.notify_buffer_size       = virtio_transport_notify_buffer_size,
>
> 		.read_skb = virtio_transport_read_skb,
>+
>+		.set_rcvlowat             = virtio_transport_set_rcvlowat
> 	},
>
> 	.send_pkt = virtio_transport_send_pkt,
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>index e22c81435ef7..88a58163046e 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>@@ -1676,6 +1676,37 @@ int virtio_transport_read_skb(struct vsock_sock *vsk, skb_read_actor_t recv_acto
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_read_skb);
>
>+int virtio_transport_set_rcvlowat(struct vsock_sock *vsk, int val)
>+{
>+	struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs = vsk->trans;
>+	bool send_update = false;

I'd declare this not initialized.

>+
>+	spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
>+
>+	/* If number of available bytes is less than new
>+	 * SO_RCVLOWAT value, kick sender to send more
>+	 * data, because sender may sleep in its 'send()'
>+	 * syscall waiting for enough space at our side.
>+	 */
>+	if (vvs->rx_bytes < val)
>+		send_update = true;

Then here just:
	send_update = vvs->rx_bytes < val;

>+
>+	spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
>+
>+	if (send_update) {
>+		int err;
>+
>+		err = virtio_transport_send_credit_update(vsk);
>+		if (err < 0)
>+			return err;
>+	}
>+
>+	WRITE_ONCE(sk_vsock(vsk)->sk_rcvlowat, val ? : 1);

Not in this patch, but what about doing this in vsock_set_rcvlowat() in 
af_vsock.c?

I mean avoid to return if `transport->set_rcvlowat(vsk, val)` is
successfully, so set sk_rcvlowat in a single point.

The rest LGTM!

Stefano

>+
>+	return 0;
>+}
>+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_set_rcvlowat);
>+
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Asias He");
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("common code for virtio vsock");
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c
>index 048640167411..388c157f6633 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c
>@@ -98,6 +98,8 @@ static struct virtio_transport loopback_transport = {
> 		.notify_buffer_size       = virtio_transport_notify_buffer_size,
>
> 		.read_skb = virtio_transport_read_skb,
>+
>+		.set_rcvlowat             = virtio_transport_set_rcvlowat
> 	},
>
> 	.send_pkt = vsock_loopback_send_pkt,
>-- 2.25.1
>