lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 14:02:47 +0100
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
To: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>,
 Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] usbnet: assign unique random MAC

On 16.11.23 13:39, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com> writes:
> 
>> A module parameter to go back to the old behavior
>> is included.
> 
> Is this really required?  If we add it now then we can never get rid of
> it.  Why not try without, and add this back if/when somebody complains
> about the new behaviour?
> 
> I believe there's a fair chance no one will notice or complain.  And we
> have much cleaner code and one module param less.

Isn't it a bit evil to change behavior?
Do you think I should make a different version for stable
with the logic for retaining the old behavior inverted?

	Regards
		Oliver


Powered by blists - more mailing lists