[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <774a8092-c677-4942-9a0a-9a42ea5ca1fd@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 14:02:47 +0100
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
To: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] usbnet: assign unique random MAC
On 16.11.23 13:39, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com> writes:
>
>> A module parameter to go back to the old behavior
>> is included.
>
> Is this really required? If we add it now then we can never get rid of
> it. Why not try without, and add this back if/when somebody complains
> about the new behaviour?
>
> I believe there's a fair chance no one will notice or complain. And we
> have much cleaner code and one module param less.
Isn't it a bit evil to change behavior?
Do you think I should make a different version for stable
with the logic for retaining the old behavior inverted?
Regards
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists