[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6eba35aa-c20e-434d-9d4d-71c1c06c7a1d@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 14:29:43 +0100
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
To: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] usbnet: assign unique random MAC
On 16.11.23 14:21, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com> writes:
>
>> On 16.11.23 13:39, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>>> Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com> writes:
>> Isn't it a bit evil to change behavior?
>
> Only if someone actually depend on the old behaviour. And I think
> there's a fair chance no one does.
Very well. I'll take it out.
>> Do you think I should make a different version for stable
>> with the logic for retaining the old behavior inverted?
>
> I assumed this was unsuitable for stable backports. Is there any reason
> to backport it?
You could argue that handing out the same MAC twice
violates standards.
Regards
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists