[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231116143905.fovty5c5qqfo7inq@skbuf>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 16:39:05 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@...el.com>
Cc: Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Luka Perkov <luka.perkov@...tura.hr>,
Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/8] net: qualcomm: ipqess: introduce the
Qualcomm IPQESS driver
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 01:55:07PM +0100, Wojciech Drewek wrote:
> Hi Romain,
> I see that you splitted the patch, thanks for that.
> However it's still too big IMHO, edma ipqess_edma could be introduced in seperate file e.g.
I agree that it's way too much code in one go (also too much code in
general). It doesn't help that much of it is blindly copied from DSA or
duplicated from the qca8k driver from the without much thought. It looks
like the EDMA portion could be separated from the switch portion.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists