| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <MW5PR11MB5811FEDAF2D1E3113C3ADCD9DDB0A@MW5PR11MB5811.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 21:36:37 +0000
From: "Ertman, David M" <david.m.ertman@...el.com>
To: "Fijalkowski, Maciej" <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>, "Nguyen, Anthony L"
<anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "kuba@...nel.org"
<kuba@...nel.org>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "Wyborny, Carolyn" <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>,
"daniel.machon@...rochip.com" <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>, "Kitszel,
Przemyslaw" <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, "Buvaneswaran, Sujai"
<sujai.buvaneswaran@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net] ice: Fix VF Reset paths when interface in a failed
over aggregate
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fijalkowski, Maciej <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2023 6:22 AM
> To: Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
> Cc: davem@...emloft.net; kuba@...nel.org; pabeni@...hat.com;
> edumazet@...gle.com; netdev@...r.kernel.org; Ertman, David M
> <david.m.ertman@...el.com>; Wyborny, Carolyn
> <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>; daniel.machon@...rochip.com; Kitszel,
> Przemyslaw <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>; Buvaneswaran, Sujai
> <sujai.buvaneswaran@...el.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ice: Fix VF Reset paths when interface in a failed
> over aggregate
>
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 01:12:41PM -0800, Tony Nguyen wrote:
> > From: Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@...el.com>
> >
> > There is an error when an interface has the following conditions:
> > - PF is in an aggregate (bond)
> > - PF has VFs created on it
> > - bond is in a state where it is failed-over to the secondary interface
> > - A VF reset is issued on one or more of those VFs
> >
> > The issue is generated by the originating PF trying to rebuild or
> > reconfigure the VF resources. Since the bond is failed over to the
> > secondary interface the queue contexts are in a modified state.
> >
> > To fix this issue, have the originating interface reclaim its resources
> > prior to the tear-down and rebuild or reconfigure. Then after the process
> > is complete, move the resources back to the currently active interface.
> >
> > There are multiple paths that can be used depending on what triggered the
> > event, so create a helper function to move the queues and use paired calls
> > to the helper (back to origin, process, then move back to active interface)
> > under the same lag_mutex lock.
> >
> > Fixes: 1e0f9881ef79 ("ice: Flesh out implementation of support for SRIOV
> on bonded interface")
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@...el.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
> > Tested-by: Sujai Buvaneswaran <sujai.buvaneswaran@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
> > ---
> > This is the net patch mentioned yesterday:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/71058999-50d9-cc17-d940-
> 3f043734e0ee@...el.com/
> >
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lag.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lag.h | 1 +
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_vf_lib.c | 20 +++++++++
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl.c | 25 +++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 88 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lag.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lag.c
> > index cd065ec48c87..9eed93baa59b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lag.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lag.c
> > @@ -679,6 +679,48 @@ static void ice_lag_move_vf_nodes(struct ice_lag
> *lag, u8 oldport, u8 newport)
> > ice_lag_move_single_vf_nodes(lag, oldport,
> newport, i);
> > }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * ice_lag_move_vf_nodes_cfg - move VF nodes outside LAG netdev
> event context
> > + * @lag: local lag struct
> > + * @src_prt: lport value for source port
> > + * @dst_prt: lport value for destination port
> > + *
> > + * This function is used to move nodes during an out-of-netdev-event
> situation,
> > + * primarily when the driver needs to reconfigure or recreate resources.
> > + *
> > + * Must be called while holding the lag_mutex to avoid lag events from
> > + * processing while out-of-sync moves are happening. Also, paired
> moves,
> > + * such as used in a reset flow, should both be called under the same
> mutex
> > + * lock to avoid changes between start of reset and end of reset.
> > + */
> > +void ice_lag_move_vf_nodes_cfg(struct ice_lag *lag, u8 src_prt, u8
> dst_prt)
> > +{
> > + struct ice_lag_netdev_list ndlist, *nl;
> > + struct list_head *tmp, *n;
> > + struct net_device *tmp_nd;
> > +
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ndlist.node);
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > + for_each_netdev_in_bond_rcu(lag->upper_netdev, tmp_nd) {
>
> Why do you need rcu section for that?
>
> under mutex? lacking context here.
>
Mutex lock is to stop lag event thread from processing any other event until
after the asynchronous reset is processed. RCU lock is to stop upper kernel
bonding driver from changing elements while reset is building a list.
> > + nl = kzalloc(sizeof(*nl), GFP_ATOMIC);
>
> do these have to be new allocations or could you just use list_move?
>
Building a list from scratch - nothing to move until it is created.
> > + if (!nl)
> > + break;
> > +
> > + nl->netdev = tmp_nd;
> > + list_add(&nl->node, &ndlist.node);
>
> list_add_rcu ?
>
I thought list_add_rcu was for internal list manipulation when prev and next
Are both known and defined?
> > + }
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
>
> you have the very same chunk of code in ice_lag_move_new_vf_nodes().
> pull
> this out to common function?
>
> ...and in ice_lag_rebuild().
>
Nice catch - for v2, pulled out code into two helper function:
ice_lag_build_netdev_list()
Iie_lag_destroy_netdev_list()
> > + lag->netdev_head = &ndlist.node;
> > + ice_lag_move_vf_nodes(lag, src_prt, dst_prt);
> > +
> > + list_for_each_safe(tmp, n, &ndlist.node) {
>
> use list_for_each_entry_safe()
>
Changed in v2.
> > + nl = list_entry(tmp, struct ice_lag_netdev_list, node);
> > + list_del(&nl->node);
> > + kfree(nl);
> > + }
> > + lag->netdev_head = NULL;
Thanks for the review!
DaveE
Powered by blists - more mailing lists