netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] indirect_call_wrapper: Fix typo in INDIRECT_CALL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 01:03:10 -0500
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] indirect_call_wrapper: Fix typo in
 INDIRECT_CALL_$NR kerneldoc

On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 17:56:26 +0000 Simon Horman wrote:
> To the netdev maintainers: get_maintainer.pl doesn't seem to
> know much about include/linux/indirect_call_wrapper.h.
> Should that be fixed?

I'm curious how many of such files exist under include/linux.
Files which are not really networking specific but only tree
the changes ever went thru is netdev.. 
But yes, in the interest of "taking responsibility" we should
probably claim it.