[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231116010310.4664dd38@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 01:03:10 -0500
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] indirect_call_wrapper: Fix typo in
INDIRECT_CALL_$NR kerneldoc
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 17:56:26 +0000 Simon Horman wrote:
> To the netdev maintainers: get_maintainer.pl doesn't seem to
> know much about include/linux/indirect_call_wrapper.h.
> Should that be fixed?
I'm curious how many of such files exist under include/linux.
Files which are not really networking specific but only tree
the changes ever went thru is netdev..
But yes, in the interest of "taking responsibility" we should
probably claim it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists