[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iKsirkSvxK4L9KQqD7Q7r0MaxOx71VBk73RCi8b1NkiZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 11:59:27 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Haifeng Xu <haifeng.xu@...pee.com>
Cc: andy@...yhouse.net, davem@...emloft.net, j.vosburgh@...il.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bonding: use a read-write lock in bonding_show_bonds()
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 11:43 AM Haifeng Xu <haifeng.xu@...pee.com> wrote:
>
> Problem description:
>
> Call stack:
> ......
> PID: 210933 TASK: ffff92424e5ec080 CPU: 13 COMMAND: "kworker/u96:2"
> [ffffa7a8e96bbac0] __schedule at ffffffffb0719898
> [ffffa7a8e96bbb48] schedule at ffffffffb0719e9e
> [ffffa7a8e96bbb68] rwsem_down_write_slowpath at ffffffffafb3167a
> [ffffa7a8e96bbc00] down_write at ffffffffb071bfc1
> [ffffa7a8e96bbc18] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns at ffffffffafe3593e
> [ffffa7a8e96bbc48] sysfs_unmerge_group at ffffffffafe38922
> [ffffa7a8e96bbc68] dpm_sysfs_remove at ffffffffb021c96a
> [ffffa7a8e96bbc80] device_del at ffffffffb0209af8
> [ffffa7a8e96bbcd0] netdev_unregister_kobject at ffffffffb04a6b0e
> [ffffa7a8e96bbcf8] unregister_netdevice_many at ffffffffb046d3d9
> [ffffa7a8e96bbd60] default_device_exit_batch at ffffffffb046d8d1
> [ffffa7a8e96bbdd0] ops_exit_list at ffffffffb045e21d
> [ffffa7a8e96bbe00] cleanup_net at ffffffffb045ea46
> [ffffa7a8e96bbe60] process_one_work at ffffffffafad94bb
> [ffffa7a8e96bbeb0] worker_thread at ffffffffafad96ad
> [ffffa7a8e96bbf10] kthread at ffffffffafae132a
> [ffffa7a8e96bbf50] ret_from_fork at ffffffffafa04b92
>
> 290858 PID: 278176 TASK: ffff925deb39a040 CPU: 32 COMMAND: "node-exporter"
> [ffffa7a8d14dbb80] __schedule at ffffffffb0719898
> [ffffa7a8d14dbc08] schedule at ffffffffb0719e9e
> [ffffa7a8d14dbc28] schedule_preempt_disabled at ffffffffb071a24e
> [ffffa7a8d14dbc38] __mutex_lock at ffffffffb071af28
> [ffffa7a8d14dbcb8] __mutex_lock_slowpath at ffffffffb071b1a3
> [ffffa7a8d14dbcc8] mutex_lock at ffffffffb071b1e2
> [ffffa7a8d14dbce0] rtnl_lock at ffffffffb047f4b5
> [ffffa7a8d14dbcf0] bonding_show_bonds at ffffffffc079b1a1 [bonding]
> [ffffa7a8d14dbd20] class_attr_show at ffffffffb02117ce
> [ffffa7a8d14dbd30] sysfs_kf_seq_show at ffffffffafe37ba1
> [ffffa7a8d14dbd50] kernfs_seq_show at ffffffffafe35c07
> [ffffa7a8d14dbd60] seq_read_iter at ffffffffafd9fce0
> [ffffa7a8d14dbdc0] kernfs_fop_read_iter at ffffffffafe36a10
> [ffffa7a8d14dbe00] new_sync_read at ffffffffafd6de23
> [ffffa7a8d14dbe90] vfs_read at ffffffffafd6e64e
> [ffffa7a8d14dbed0] ksys_read at ffffffffafd70977
> [ffffa7a8d14dbf10] __x64_sys_read at ffffffffafd70a0a
> [ffffa7a8d14dbf20] do_syscall_64 at ffffffffb070bf1c
> [ffffa7a8d14dbf50] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffffb080007c
> ......
>
> Thread 210933 holds the rtnl_mutex and tries to acquire the kernfs_rwsem,
> but there are many readers which hold the kernfs_rwsem, so it has to sleep
> for a long time to wait the readers release the lock. Thread 278176 and any
> other threads which call bonding_show_bonds() also need to wait because
> they try to acquire the rtnl_mutex.
>
> bonding_show_bonds() uses rtnl_mutex to protect the bond_list traversal.
> However, the addition and deletion of bond_list are only performed in
> bond_init()/bond_uninit(), so we can introduce a separate read-write lock
> to synchronize bond list mutation.
>
> What are the benefits of this change?
>
> 1) All threads which call bonding_show_bonds() only wait when the
> registration or unregistration of bond device happens.
>
> 2) There are many other users of rtnl_mutex, so bonding_show_bonds()
> won't compete with them.
>
> In a word, this change reduces the lock contention of rtnl_mutex.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haifeng Xu <haifeng.xu@...pee.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - move the call stack after the description
> - fix typos in the changelog
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 4 ++++
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c | 6 ++++--
> include/net/bonding.h | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index 8e6cc0e133b7..db8f1efaab78 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -5957,7 +5957,9 @@ static void bond_uninit(struct net_device *bond_dev)
>
> bond_set_slave_arr(bond, NULL, NULL);
>
> + write_lock(&bonding_dev_lock);
> list_del(&bond->bond_list);
> + write_unlock(&bonding_dev_lock);
>
> bond_debug_unregister(bond);
> }
> @@ -6370,7 +6372,9 @@ static int bond_init(struct net_device *bond_dev)
> spin_lock_init(&bond->stats_lock);
> netdev_lockdep_set_classes(bond_dev);
>
> + write_lock(&bonding_dev_lock);
> list_add_tail(&bond->bond_list, &bn->dev_list);
> + write_unlock(&bonding_dev_lock);
>
> bond_prepare_sysfs_group(bond);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
> index 2805135a7205..e107c1d7a6bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@
>
> #define to_bond(cd) ((struct bonding *)(netdev_priv(to_net_dev(cd))))
>
> +DEFINE_RWLOCK(bonding_dev_lock);
> +
> /* "show" function for the bond_masters attribute.
> * The class parameter is ignored.
> */
> @@ -40,7 +42,7 @@ static ssize_t bonding_show_bonds(const struct class *cls,
> int res = 0;
> struct bonding *bond;
>
> - rtnl_lock();
> + read_lock(&bonding_dev_lock);
>
> list_for_each_entry(bond, &bn->dev_list, bond_list) {
> if (res > (PAGE_SIZE - IFNAMSIZ)) {
> @@ -55,7 +57,7 @@ static ssize_t bonding_show_bonds(const struct class *cls,
> if (res)
> buf[res-1] = '\n'; /* eat the leftover space */
>
> - rtnl_unlock();
> + read_unlock(&bonding_dev_lock);
> return res;
> }
This unfortunately would race with dev_change_name()
You probably need to read_lock(&devnet_rename_sem); before copying dev->name,
or use netdev_get_name(net, temp_buffer, bond->dev->ifindex)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists