netdev - Re: [PATCH] nfp: flower: Added pointer check and continue.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZVd4RYURdHLL+F2h@LouisNoVo>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 16:27:17 +0200
From: Louis Peens <louis.peens@...igine.com>
To: Denis Arefev <arefev@...mel.ru>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	oss-drivers@...igine.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfp: flower: Added pointer check and continue.

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 03:57:01PM +0300, Denis Arefev wrote:
> 
> Return value of a function 'kmalloc_array' is dereferenced at
> lag_conf.c without checking for null, but it is usually
> checked for this function.
> 
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Denis Arefev <arefev@...mel.ru>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/lag_conf.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/lag_conf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/lag_conf.c
> index 88d6d992e7d0..8cc6cce73283 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/lag_conf.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/lag_conf.c
> @@ -339,6 +339,11 @@ static void nfp_fl_lag_do_work(struct work_struct *work)
>                 acti_netdevs = kmalloc_array(entry->slave_cnt,
>                                              sizeof(*acti_netdevs), GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> +               if (!acti_netdevs) {
> +                       schedule_delayed_work(&lag->work, NFP_FL_LAG_DELAY);
> +                       continue;
> +               }
> +
Thanks for reporting this Denis, it definitely seems to be an oversight.
Would you mind adding a 'nfp_flower_cmsg_warn' here as well, so that
this case does not go undetected? Maybe something like "cannot
allocate memory for group processing" can work.

>                 /* Include sanity check in the loop. It may be that a bond has
>                  * changed between processing the last notification and the
>                  * work queue triggering. If the number of slaves has changed
> --
> 2.25.1
>