netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 7/9] firmware_loader: Expand Firmware upload error codes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 09:56:51 +0100
From: Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski
 <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jonathan Corbet
 <corbet@....net>, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, Russ Weight
 <russ.weight@...ux.dev>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 7/9] firmware_loader: Expand Firmware upload
 error codes

On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 22:56:10 +0100
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:

> > This would be rather helpful to me for some stuff that I am currently
> > working on and was hoping to send to Arnd for inclusion in 6.8:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231020-series-uncooked-077b107af3ae@spud/
> > 
> > I'm currently returning a "HW_ERROR" for something that this would fit
> > the bill for (in mpfs_auto_update_write()). What would the ETA for this
> > stuff landing via the net tree be?
> > Since I am not a netdev contributor its hard to tell how controversial
> > these patches are!  
> 
> It already has the needed ACKs, so it could be merged
> anytime. However, it seems like two different subsystems are
> interested in it. So rather than merge it via netdev, it might make
> sense to merge it via its normal tree, driver-core. Then ask for a
> stable branch which can be pulled into netdev and arm-soc.

Ok, I will remove this patch from this series in v2 and send it through normal
tree.

Regards,
-- 
Köry Maincent, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com