lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ZVkRkhMHWcAR37fW@shell.armlinux.org.uk> Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2023 19:33:38 +0000 From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk> To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> Cc: Luo Jie <quic_luoj@...cinc.com>, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, hkallweit1@...il.com, corbet@....net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] net: phy: at803x: add QCA8084 ethernet phy support On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 04:51:42PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 02:27:51PM +0800, Luo Jie wrote: > > Add qca8084 PHY support, which is four-port PHY with maximum > > link capability 2.5G, the features of each port is almost same > > as QCA8081 and slave seed config is not needed. > > > > Three kind of interface modes supported by qca8084. > > PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_10G_QXGMII, PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_2500BASEX and > > PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII. > > Sorry for joining the conversation late. > > I'm trying to get my head around QXGMII. Let me describe what i think > is happening, and then you can correct me.... > > You have 4 MACs, probably in a switch. The MII interfaces from these > MACs go into a multiplexer, and out comes QXGMII? You then have a > SERDES interface out of the switch and into the PHY package. Inside > the PHY package there is a demultiplexor, giving you four MII > interfaces, one to each PHY in the package. > > If you have the PHY SERDES running in 2500BaseX, you have a single > MAC, no mux/demux, and only one PHY is used? The other three are idle. > Same from SGMII? > > So the interface mode QXGMII is a property of the package. It is not > really a property of one PHY. Having one PHY using QXGMII and another > SGMII does not work? 10G_QXGMII is defined in the Cisco USXGMII multi-port document as one of several possibilities for a USXGMII-M link. The Cisco document can be a little confusing beause it states that 10G_QXGMII supports 10M, 100M, 1G and 2.5G, and then only talks about a 10G and 100M/1G MAC. For 10G_QXGMII, there are 4 MAC interfaces. These are connected to a rate "adaption" through symbol replication block, and then on to a clause 49 PCS block. There is then a port MUX and framing block, followed by the PMA serdes which communicates with the remote end over a single pair of transmit/receive serdes lines. Each interface also has its own clause 37 autoneg block. So, for an interface to operate in SGMII mode, it would have to be muxed to a different path before being presented to the USXGMII-M block since each interface does not have its own external data lane - thus that's out of scope of USXGMII-M as documented by Cisco. Hope this helps. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists