| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID:
<SJ0PR18MB52163FEAA54C9F023BFFE5F9DBB6A@SJ0PR18MB5216.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2023 17:52:38 +0000
From: Suman Ghosh <sumang@...vell.com>
To: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@...el.com>,
Sunil Kovvuri Goutham
<sgoutham@...vell.com>,
Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@...vell.com>,
Subbaraya
Sundeep Bhatta <sbhatta@...vell.com>,
Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com"
<edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linu Cherian <lcherian@...vell.com>,
Jerin
Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@...vell.com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [net-next PATCH 2/2] octeontx2-pf: TC flower offload
support for mirror
>
>Only small nits,
>Reviewed-by: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@...el.com>
>
>> .../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_tc.c | 110
>> +++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 108 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_tc.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_tc.c
>> index 8a5e3987a482..cfcf935b1003 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_tc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_tc.c
>> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
>>
>> #define OTX2_UNSUPP_LSE_DEPTH GENMASK(6, 4)
>>
>> +#define MCAST_INVALID_GRP (-1U)
>> +
>> struct otx2_tc_flow_stats {
>> u64 bytes;
>> u64 pkts;
>> @@ -47,6 +49,7 @@ struct otx2_tc_flow {
>> bool is_act_police;
>> u32 prio;
>> struct npc_install_flow_req req;
>> + u32 mcast_grp_idx;
>> };
>>
>> static void otx2_get_egress_burst_cfg(struct otx2_nic *nic, u32
>> burst, @@ -336,22 +339,95 @@ static int otx2_tc_act_set_police(struct
>otx2_nic *nic,
>> return rc;
>> }
>>
>> +static int otx2_tc_update_mcast(struct otx2_nic *nic,
>> + struct npc_install_flow_req *req,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
>> + struct otx2_tc_flow *node,
>> + struct nix_mcast_grp_update_req *ureq,
>> + u8 num_intf)
>> +{
>> + struct nix_mcast_grp_update_req *grp_update_req;
>> + struct nix_mcast_grp_create_req *creq;
>> + struct nix_mcast_grp_create_rsp *crsp;
>> + u32 grp_index;
>> + int rc;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&nic->mbox.lock);
>> + creq = otx2_mbox_alloc_msg_nix_mcast_grp_create(&nic->mbox);
>> + if (!creq) {
>> + mutex_unlock(&nic->mbox.lock);
>
>I would put mutex_unlock at the end and use goto but it's up to you.
[Suman] Ack. This would make the code more readable, will update in v2.
>
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + creq->dir = NIX_MCAST_INGRESS;
>> + /* Send message to AF */
>> + rc = otx2_sync_mbox_msg(&nic->mbox);
>> + if (rc) {
>> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Failed to create multicast
>group");
>> + mutex_unlock(&nic->mbox.lock);
>> + return rc;
>> + }
>> +
>> + crsp = (struct nix_mcast_grp_create_rsp *)otx2_mbox_get_rsp(&nic-
>>mbox.mbox,
>> + 0,
>> + &creq->hdr);
>> + if (IS_ERR(crsp)) {
>> + mutex_unlock(&nic->mbox.lock);
>> + return PTR_ERR(crsp);
>> + }
>> +
>> + grp_index = crsp->mcast_grp_idx;
>> + grp_update_req = otx2_mbox_alloc_msg_nix_mcast_grp_update(&nic-
>>mbox);
>> + if (!grp_update_req) {
>> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Failed to update multicast
>group");
>> + mutex_unlock(&nic->mbox.lock);
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ureq->op = NIX_MCAST_OP_ADD_ENTRY;
>> + ureq->mcast_grp_idx = grp_index;
>> + ureq->num_mce_entry = num_intf;
>> + ureq->pcifunc[0] = nic->pcifunc;
>> + ureq->channel[0] = nic->hw.tx_chan_base;
>> +
>> + ureq->dest_type[0] = NIX_RX_RSS;
>> + ureq->rq_rss_index[0] = 0;
>> + memcpy(&ureq->hdr, &grp_update_req->hdr, sizeof(struct
>mbox_msghdr));
>> + memcpy(grp_update_req, ureq, sizeof(struct
>> +nix_mcast_grp_update_req));
>> +
>> + /* Send message to AF */
>> + rc = otx2_sync_mbox_msg(&nic->mbox);
>> + if (rc) {
>> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Failed to update multicast
>group");
>> + mutex_unlock(&nic->mbox.lock);
>> + return rc;
>> + }
>> +
>> + mutex_unlock(&nic->mbox.lock);
>> + req->op = NIX_RX_ACTIONOP_MCAST;
>> + req->index = grp_index;
>> + node->mcast_grp_idx = grp_index;
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int otx2_tc_parse_actions(struct otx2_nic *nic,
>> struct flow_action *flow_action,
>> struct npc_install_flow_req *req,
>> struct flow_cls_offload *f,
>> struct otx2_tc_flow *node)
>> {
>> + struct nix_mcast_grp_update_req dummy_grp_update_req = { 0 };
>> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack = f->common.extack;
>> + bool pps = false, mcast = false;
>> struct flow_action_entry *act;
>> struct net_device *target;
>> struct otx2_nic *priv;
>> u32 burst, mark = 0;
>> u8 nr_police = 0;
>> - bool pps = false;
>> + u8 num_intf = 1;
>> + int rc, i;
>> u64 rate;
>> int err;
>> - int i;
>>
>> if (!flow_action_has_entries(flow_action)) {
>> NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "no tc actions specified"); @@ -
>423,11
>> +499,30 @@ static int otx2_tc_parse_actions(struct otx2_nic *nic,
>> req->index = act->rx_queue;
>> break;
>>
>> + case FLOW_ACTION_MIRRED_INGRESS:
>> + target = act->dev;
>> + priv = netdev_priv(target);
>> + dummy_grp_update_req.pcifunc[num_intf] = priv->pcifunc;
>> + dummy_grp_update_req.channel[num_intf] = priv-
>>hw.tx_chan_base;
>> + dummy_grp_update_req.dest_type[num_intf] = NIX_RX_RSS;
>> + dummy_grp_update_req.rq_rss_index[num_intf] = 0;
>> + mcast = true;
>> + num_intf++;
>> + break;
>> +
>> default:
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> + if (mcast) {
>> + rc = otx2_tc_update_mcast(nic, req, extack, node,
>> + &dummy_grp_update_req,
>> + num_intf);
>> + if (rc)
>> + return rc;
>
>I think we can use err here, no need for new variable
[Suman] Ack, will update in v2.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> if (nr_police > 1) {
>> NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
>> "rate limit police offload requires a single
>action"); @@
>> -1033,6 +1128,7 @@ static int otx2_tc_del_flow(struct otx2_nic *nic,
>> struct flow_cls_offload *tc_flow_cmd) {
>> struct otx2_flow_config *flow_cfg = nic->flow_cfg;
>> + struct nix_mcast_grp_destroy_req *grp_destroy_req;
>> struct otx2_tc_flow *flow_node;
>> int err;
>>
>> @@ -1064,6 +1160,15 @@ static int otx2_tc_del_flow(struct otx2_nic
>*nic,
>> mutex_unlock(&nic->mbox.lock);
>> }
>>
>> + /* Remove the multicast/mirror related nodes */
>> + if (flow_node->mcast_grp_idx != MCAST_INVALID_GRP) {
>> + mutex_lock(&nic->mbox.lock);
>> + grp_destroy_req =
>otx2_mbox_alloc_msg_nix_mcast_grp_destroy(&nic->mbox);
>> + grp_destroy_req->mcast_grp_idx = flow_node->mcast_grp_idx;
>> + otx2_sync_mbox_msg(&nic->mbox);
>> + mutex_unlock(&nic->mbox.lock);
>> + }
>> +
>> otx2_del_mcam_flow_entry(nic, flow_node->entry, NULL);
>> otx2_tc_update_mcam_table(nic, flow_cfg, flow_node, false);
>> kfree_rcu(flow_node, rcu);
>> @@ -1096,6 +1201,7 @@ static int otx2_tc_add_flow(struct otx2_nic
>*nic,
>> spin_lock_init(&new_node->lock);
>> new_node->cookie = tc_flow_cmd->cookie;
>> new_node->prio = tc_flow_cmd->common.prio;
>> + new_node->mcast_grp_idx = MCAST_INVALID_GRP;
>>
>> memset(&dummy, 0, sizeof(struct npc_install_flow_req));
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists