[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231120094234.1aae153e@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 09:42:34 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] net: phy: correctly check soft_reset ret ONLY
if defined for PHY
On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 14:15:40 +0100 Christian Marangi wrote:
> Luckly nothing was ever added before the soft_reset call so the ret
> check (in the case where a PHY didn't had soft_reset defined) although
> wrong, never caused problems as ret was init 0 at the start of
> phy_init_hw.
not currently a bug => no Fixes tag, please
--
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists