netdev - [PATCH v2] nfc: virtual_ncidev: Add variable to check if ndev is running

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231121075357.344-1-phind.uet@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 15:53:57 +0800
From: Nguyen Dinh Phi <phind.uet@...il.com>
To: Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@...sung.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Nguyen Dinh Phi <phind.uet@...il.com>,
	syzbot+6eb09d75211863f15e3e@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] nfc: virtual_ncidev: Add variable to check if ndev is running

syzbot reported an memory leak that happens when an skb is add to
send_buff after virtual nci closed.
This patch adds a variable to track if the ndev is running before
handling new skb in send function.

Signed-off-by: Nguyen Dinh Phi <phind.uet@...il.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+6eb09d75211863f15e3e@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/00000000000075472b06007df4fb@google.com
---
V2:
    - Remove unused macro.
    - Re-adding a line that was removed wrongly.
 drivers/nfc/virtual_ncidev.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nfc/virtual_ncidev.c b/drivers/nfc/virtual_ncidev.c
index b027be0b0b6f..590b038e449e 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/virtual_ncidev.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/virtual_ncidev.c
@@ -26,10 +26,14 @@ struct virtual_nci_dev {
 	struct mutex mtx;
 	struct sk_buff *send_buff;
 	struct wait_queue_head wq;
+	bool running;
 };
 
 static int virtual_nci_open(struct nci_dev *ndev)
 {
+	struct virtual_nci_dev *vdev = nci_get_drvdata(ndev);
+
+	vdev->running = true;
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -40,6 +44,7 @@ static int virtual_nci_close(struct nci_dev *ndev)
 	mutex_lock(&vdev->mtx);
 	kfree_skb(vdev->send_buff);
 	vdev->send_buff = NULL;
+	vdev->running = false;
 	mutex_unlock(&vdev->mtx);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -50,7 +55,7 @@ static int virtual_nci_send(struct nci_dev *ndev, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	struct virtual_nci_dev *vdev = nci_get_drvdata(ndev);
 
 	mutex_lock(&vdev->mtx);
-	if (vdev->send_buff) {
+	if (vdev->send_buff || !vdev->running) {
 		mutex_unlock(&vdev->mtx);
 		kfree_skb(skb);
 		return -1;
-- 
2.39.2