[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PH7PR21MB3116043F0A93BD5AD23C6C91CABBA@PH7PR21MB3116.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 17:37:11 +0000
From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
To: Souradeep Chakrabarti <schakrabarti@...ux.microsoft.com>, KY Srinivasan
<kys@...rosoft.com>, "wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui
<decui@...rosoft.com>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>, "kuba@...nel.org"
<kuba@...nel.org>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, Long Li
<longli@...rosoft.com>, "sharmaajay@...rosoft.com"
<sharmaajay@...rosoft.com>, "leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>,
"cai.huoqing@...ux.dev" <cai.huoqing@...ux.dev>,
"ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com" <ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>, "tglx@...utronix.de"
<tglx@...utronix.de>, "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Souradeep Chakrabarti <schakrabarti@...rosoft.com>, Paul Rosswurm
<paulros@...rosoft.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 net-next] net: mana: Assigning IRQ affinity on HT cores
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Souradeep Chakrabarti <schakrabarti@...ux.microsoft.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2023 8:55 AM
> + /* for each interrupt find the cpu of a particular
> + * sibling set and if it belongs to the specific numa
> + * then assign irq to it and clear the cpu bit from
> + * the corresponding avail_cpus.
> + * Increase the cpu_count for that node.
> + * Once all cpus for a numa node is assigned, then
> + * move to different numa node and continue the same.
> + */
> + for (i = irq_start; i < nvec; ) {
> +
> + /* check if the numa node has cpu or not
> + * to avoid infinite loop.
> + */
> + if (cpumask_empty(cpumask_of_node(numa_node))) {
> + numa_node++;
Since it starts at start_numa_node, we should consider roll over at the
num_online_nodes() like the code below:
if (numa_node == num_online_nodes())
numa_node = 0;
It should also check empty for the next one.
And set node_count = 0; after the loop.
> + if (++node_count == num_online_nodes()) {
> + err = -EAGAIN;
Consider return -ENODEV, because we are not asking for retry.
> + goto free_irq;
> + }
> + }
Thanks,
- Haiyang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists