netdev - Re: [PATCH 19/34] sfc: switch to using atomic find

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4aa03b21-5503-1d62-66b1-aa1b3c42011d@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 19:46:39 +0000
From: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Martin Habets <habetsm.xilinx@...il.com>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@....com
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Mirsad Todorovac
 <mirsad.todorovac@....unizg.hr>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
 Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
 Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyrkov@...aro.org>,
 Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/34] sfc: switch to using atomic find_bit() API where
 appropriate

On 18/11/2023 15:50, Yury Norov wrote:
> SFC code traverses rps_slot_map and rxq_retry_mask bit by bit. We can do
> it better by using dedicated atomic find_bit() functions, because they
> skip already clear bits.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>

Reviewed-by: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>